Post AxSvtCtWy4idCNwYN6 by [email protected] | |
More posts by [email protected] | |
Post #AxSvtCJN8VnNOF1g0m by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
Today I learnt that Racket *intentionally* doesn't have a traditional REPL … | |
Post #AxSvtCRscsbJod0TGy by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@wilfredh One of the saddest facts | |
Post #AxSvtCYcDpzM9W9qls by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@jack @wilfredh (define (f) 25)C-x C-e(define (g) (+ (f) 10))C-x C-e(g)C-x C-e… | |
Post #AxSvtCfLonNOUPJEGm by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@jack @wilfredh I mean, I'd expect The Right Thing to be the interface sayi… | |
Post #AxSvtClNSOCGn682fA by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@PaniczGodek @jack @wilfredh Common Lisp kind of does that, and has an arguably… | |
Post #AxSvtCtWy4idCNwYN6 by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@aartaka @jack @wilfredh I just tried with SBCL, and it only gave me a redefini… | |
Post #AxSvtD0GZ26fXH5vs0 by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@PaniczGodek @jack @wilfredh yes, right. I guess I had the dangerous behavior c… | |
Post #AxSvtD7i7M3ruMZsTQ by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@aartaka @jack @wilfredh I mean, to me most of the time using C-x C-e for e.g. … | |
Post #AxSvtDF9fg14HS3p4q by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@PaniczGodek @aartaka @jack I'm definitely sympathetic to the view that it … | |
Post #AxSvtDMFFJggdRNU80 by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@PaniczGodek @aartaka @jack I'd also argue that differing definitions is st… | |
Post #AxSvtDU2mJvT1d1iHg by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@PaniczGodek @aartaka @jack I am working in a toy PL (Garden) in this space, bu… | |
Post #AxSvtDaQOb1vLQ0oEK by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@wilfredh @PaniczGodek @aartaka Are you assuming that the editor will be connec… | |
Post #AxSvtDiDvbGhjbf2O0 by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@jack @PaniczGodek @aartaka Yeah, exactly.The devil's in the details though… | |
Post #AxSvtDobXsNA3Oe8Ke by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@wilfredh but wait, isn’t LSP file-oriented? Clojure one is, and it sucks.@ja… | |
Post #AxSvtDuzA9TcNBdEHI by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@aartaka @jack @PaniczGodek Well, LSP reflects the state of the editor: the edi… | |
Post #AxSvtE10nkIUfsS2fg by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@wilfredh no, I simply didn’t know about it! Thanks for the details!@jack @Pa… | |
Post #AxSvvKkuiCG49svXGa by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@PaniczGodek @aartaka @wilfredh The concept of “underlying interpreter stateďż˝… | |
Post #AxSvvKsMGWDGWyPTs0 by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@jack Excel though. We can (theoretically) have immediately reactive programmin… |