 |
Post AxN6qx4yjP8o7HfKwy by [email protected] |
 |
More posts by [email protected] |
|
Post #AxIwFOcA8D9OKyni8e by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 1 repeats |
|
|
|
I've just about had it with the vagaries of true/false positive/negative. H… |
|
|
|
Post #AxJ8KIiIhJ8svwmF5E by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 1 repeats |
|
|
|
@mttaggart have been running with “Benign positive” for a few years for thi… |
|
|
|
Post #AxJfcXsOMHTPeynwo4 by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 1 repeats |
|
|
|
@mttaggart ooh one of my favorite topics, though I come at it from a different … |
|
|
|
Post #AxJgcrA0lBtVQHl45Y by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 1 repeats |
|
|
|
@knitcode That sounds like D:A+/R:I-::B, but I take your point that you're … |
|
|
|
Post #AxJhBJXbkRwXI1E4Q4 by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 1 repeats |
|
|
|
@mttaggart yep probably.. mostly I get annoyed by obsession over FPR when for a… |
|
|
|
Post #AxJjKV7aGJsxigYtM0 by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 1 repeats |
|
|
|
@knitcode @mttaggart hah! I've told people I got it from you. Including a u… |
|
|
|
Post #AxN59BbrFMnCUAbzii by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 1 repeats |
|
|
|
@mttaggart i think the flow chart in your linked discussion is "good"… |
|
|
|
Post #AxN6qwyb782LnUgF0K by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@scottley I considered this construction, and did not go with it because it obs… |
|
|
|
Post #AxN6qx4yjP8o7HfKwy by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@mttaggart my construction requires integration between security and compliance… |
|
|
|
Post #AxN6qxB0MzxgPyU9LM by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 1 repeats |
|
|
|
@scottley I'm reading "requires" in that statement as "assum… |
