 |
Post AtVaIFvNM2kNknPjnc by [email protected] |
 |
More posts by [email protected] |
|
Post #AtVaIFvNM2kNknPjnc by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
I just discovered something really subtle about WireGuard... TL;DR if you are a… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvN8dvx4cXelQQTo by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina oh, wait, that could finally explain why I had to set a different #MTU th… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvN8ljU4rK2x4edU by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina we had a 1476 bytes MTU on the PPPoE interface. I would have expected a 1… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvNjUIxpu3vcCl6m by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@[email protected] That explains the MTU weirdness I've seen before that went … |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvPpzfkKEogXse36 by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina i remember reading that bit of code for the padding.. i did not think it … |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvQCsieLLHfdnuu8 by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
Will reducing the client MTU actually solve this problem in general?I guess wha… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvQYpH3petjKMTaa by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina that sounds like an utter pain to find out, lol |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvSuhsgCUmAg1dKq by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina Sounds like a failure of the implementation of the autonegotiations, or n… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvSuoGITbEUT0jHU by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@raulinbonn As far as I know WireGuard does not do PMTU discovery for the upper… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvWIwh157cDQZQZs by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina @raulinbonn WireGuard is, at many points, too simple. 😦 |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvWJ34dME4XDYWWW by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@Conan_Kudo @lina Yes, too simple an implementation --> poor or nonexistent … |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvY1YcdWRerl8DPk by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@T_X Yup, if the other side of the tunnel had a higher MTU! |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvZ93sDpRSQfHeCm by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina Huh, I didn't know that (and the current MTU on my Wireguard connecti… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvdb5VxikUVgAr56 by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina interesting, I would assume rounding down would be more sensible if it… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvdbCbXMQ6rfUW8G by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@shironeko The rounding up to a multiple of 16 is to make traffic analysis more… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvhcDxgCSPBz2cJk by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@raulinbonn @Conan_Kudo It's not actually possible to implement this proper… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvhcKhH9qRWsBzoe by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina @Conan_Kudo But could the user make better guesses about lower expected M… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvhcR4tQwtqfB5lI by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@raulinbonn @Conan_Kudo The software can't magically guess what kind of net… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvhcX6X1lm9Lzu9g by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina @Conan_Kudo The user also can't magically know what kind of networks … |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvmglqCg8AjzJ6ie by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina @raulinbonn @Conan_Kudo it is possible to implement this correctly. Do PM… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvnPwMGQHWpdZdrM by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@raulinbonn @Conan_Kudo That's what I'm saying, that the default for sy… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvnQ35rNfZAWj1MG by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@lina @Conan_Kudo For servers, that's a scenario and userbase I was not ref… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvntXwBmZaeaNYxc by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@kasperd WireGuard allows fragmentation on the upper layer, so it's suppose… |
|
|
|
Post #AtVvsazeb0eOYoaJ3w by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@[email protected] thank you =^__^;;= |
