 |
Post AtNiKfG3NgVLGw49uC by [email protected] |
 |
More posts by [email protected] |
|
Post #AtNiKbg8gkzgAgEw0e by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
For a while people agreed that the smallest number was 2, and 1 wasn't a nu… |
|
|
|
Post #AtNiKbmAKLoYTN3kP2 by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
I changed my mind. Regular sets aren't numbers, because there is nothing li… |
|
|
|
Post #AtNiKbtbsflkqSXh0S by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@mjd Sets form a ring with symmetric difference as the "addition" and… |
|
|
|
Post #AtNiKbzzUwsDAFWmx6 by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@gjm I see I completely missed your point, I thought you were trying to rehabil… |
|
|
|
Post #AtNiKfG3NgVLGw49uC by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@mjd My apologies! I had thought you meant "regular" in the colloquia… |
|
|
|
Post #AtNiKhRpEt6q41aaX2 by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@gjm Does regular set concatenation distribute over symmetric difference? It d… |
|
|
|
Post #AtNiKhYCrADINoZgTg by [email protected] |
|
0 likes, 0 repeats |
|
|
|
@gjm Indeed, it does not. Let A={x,xx}, B={x}, C={xx}. Then:AB = {xx,xxx}AC =… |
