Post AmRJkdv1IH7Ei37Sjo by [email protected] | |
More posts by [email protected] | |
Post #AmOgAhG772RE7Dw0em by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 1 repeats | |
Given a #css selector like this:```[value="0"] ~ * > :nth-child(1)… | |
Post #AmOjtM7OrJs7RWqU3E by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@siblingpastry I don’t think so. There’s no real way to get information out… | |
Post #AmOjtMEUQxXjnWA96O by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 1 repeats | |
@knowler I suspected as much, thanks. I really want a regex-matching attribute … | |
Post #AmOktyblr2mYlsuYLY by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@siblingpastry There’s an issue here in regards to the accessibility-related … | |
Post #AmOktyirQgSB7sEDOi by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@siblingpastry Actually I guess this is a bit different… anyway, I expect XPa… | |
Post #AmOktypF2xYdRfDJLM by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 1 repeats | |
@knowler Gotcha, yeah there's conceptual overlap, it points to a similar ma… | |
Post #AmRBdzz43fFPU1KeOW by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@siblingpastry If not for the `~` part, in one of the potential future timeline… | |
Post #AmRBe05RfwLrnoJkLA by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 1 repeats | |
@kizu Hmm I wonder if a combination of `attr()` assigned to value within a `:ha… | |
Post #AmRIFc2M8jjtwUBsNE by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@siblingpastry Yeah, currently there is no way to assign values to use inside s… | |
Post #AmRIFc81neHCE4qPDM by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 1 repeats | |
@kizu I favour the regex attribute selector syntax, for how familiar it is, but… | |
Post #AmRJkdUmro8FOgqVqi by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@siblingpastry So, I'll need to work on it more, but maybe I have a draft i… | |
Post #AmRJkdbAU5EhiTpbnM by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 1 repeats | |
@kizu So n dynamically propagates through the selector in traversal order? | |
Post #AmRJkdv1IH7Ei37Sjo by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 0 repeats | |
@siblingpastry A `:same-n(:nth-child(n))` could probably be simplified as just … | |
Post #AmRK39MJ8fTFQphx0y by [email protected] | |
0 likes, 1 repeats | |
@kizu Yup that makes in theory. The syntax is a bit wooly, as you say and I agr… |