/forums/renewablerevolution/p/263/2 on gopher.createaforum.com

	Return Create A Forum - Home
	---------------------------------------------------------
	Renewable Revolution
	https://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com
	---------------------------------------------------------
	*****************************************************
	Return to: Hydrocarbon Industry Skullduggery
	*****************************************************
	#Post#: 10157--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:34 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	[quote author=AGelbert link=topic=264.msg9499#msg9499
	date=1523497603]
	[center][img
	width=400]
	http://realsociology.edublogs.org/files/2010/08/460_0___30_0_0_0_0_0_shell_skul…
	[center]#ShellKnew: Green Group Sues Oil Giant Over Climate
	🔥
	Impact[/center]
	Internal documents show the oil giant has known for decades that
	fossil fuel activities would lead to catastrophic climate
	change, and that it deliberately mislead the public. Friends of
	the Earth Netherlands says it will take Shell to court if it
	doesn't do more to cut its climate impact. We speak to campaign
	leader Freek Bersch
	[center]
	https://youtu.be/WneSJCeiO0U[/center]
	http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=7…
	[center][img
	width=800]
	https://collapseofindustrialcivilization.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/snap-2013-…
	[/quote]
	#Post#: 10158--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:37 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	[quote author=AGelbert link=topic=264.msg9534#msg9534
	date=1524248362]
	EcoWatch
	[center]Record Number of Lawmakers Sign Resolution Calling for
	[b]Pruitt's 🦖 Resignation[/b][/center]
	By Lorraine Chow
	Apr. 19, 2018 08:11AM EST
	A group of 39 senators and 131 representatives signed a
	resolution calling for the "immediate resignation" of Scott
	Pruitt, the scandal-plagued U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
	(EPA) administrator.
	The document represents a record number of senators to formally
	demand a cabinet official to step down.
	The resolution comes in the wake of Pruitt's growing list of
	controversies: his request for a $43,000 sound-proof phone booth
	violated federal law; his $50-a-night stay at a Capitol Hill
	condo owned by the wife of an energy lobbyist; his questionable
	use of taxpayer money for first-class and charter flights, as
	well as a 'round-the-clock security detail; and reports that he
	gave large pay raises to his closest aides.
	That's not to mention Pruitt's continued efforts to dismantle
	the legacy of the very agency he heads.
	Per the resolution, "The Agency is hemorrhaging staff and
	experts needed to protect the health, safety, and livelihood of
	millions of people of the United States, with more than 700
	employees of the Agency having left or been forced out of the
	Agency during his tenure as Administrator."
	"By delaying the effective date of regulations, easing
	enforcement of existing regulations, and delaying implementation
	of new regulations, Administrator Pruitt is helping polluters at
	the expense of the health, safety, and livelihood of millions of
	people of the United States," it adds.
	No Republicans added their name to the document, even though
	Republican Reps. Elise Stefanik (NY), Carlos Curbelo (FL) and
	Illeana Ros-Lehtinen (FL.) have previously called for Pruitt's
	resignation or firing.
	The effort was led by Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) and
	Representative Kathy Castor (D-FL).
	"During his time in office, Pruitt has waged all-out war on the
	bedrock protections that keep our air and water clean, prevent
	toxic chemicals from contaminating our communities, and
	safeguard the health of our kids and families," Udall said. "He
	has done lasting damage to public health and safety�gutting the
	EPA's core mission�all to benefit his campaign donors and grease
	the wheels for his big polluter friends."
	It's not just politicians who are calling for Pruitt's ouster.
	More than 30 environmental and civil rights organizations,
	including the NAACP, the Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth,
	took out full-page newspaper ads on Wednesday in The New York
	Times, the New York Post and Pruitt's home-state paper, The
	Oklahoman, The Hill reported.
	Meanwhile, President Donald Trump 🦀 has praised
	Pruitt�who has carried out the administration's deregulatory
	agenda�for "doing a great job." 😈
	Trump is reportedly fond of his EPA chief, even though John F.
	Kelly, the White House chief of staff, has urged the president
	to let Pruitt go.
	"No one other than the president has the authority to hire and
	fire," White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said
	earlier this month. "The president feels that the administrator
	has done a good job at EPA."
	She said the White House is conducting an internal investigation
	into Pruitt's conduct.
	https://www.ecowatch.com/scott-pruitt-resignation-congress-2561438310.html
	RELATED ARTICLES AROUND THE WEB
	Scott Pruitt Has Betrayed the Mission, the National Interest and
	the ... �
	Former aide tells Congress of extravagant spending by EPA's
	Scott ... �
	E.P.A. Chief's $43,000 Phone Booth Broke the Law, Congressional
	... �
	EPA administrator Scott Pruitt is slowly strangling his agency -
	Vox �
	[quote]Ray Mathis � University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
	Who do people think he's talking to in his soundproof booth?
	What do they think he's talking about? Why does it need to keep
	what he says so secret from everyone else in the EPA? Isn't it
	possible that he's engaging in RICO violations? I think the
	Justice Department should be investigating possible violations.
	And if the predicted 100K extra unnecessary deaths due to
	increases in pollution come to pass. he should definitely be
	prosecuted.
	Arnie McGill
	Pruitt's a crook, pure and simple.[/quote]
	[/quote]
	#Post#: 10159--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:40 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	[quote author=AGelbert link=topic=264.msg9558#msg9558
	date=1524784373]
	[font=times new roman]Truthout[/font]
	[img
	width=110]
	https://www.afsc.org/sites/afsc.civicactions.net/files/u1752/Truthout%20logo.jp…
	[center][img
	width=70]
	http://www.funny-emoticons.com/files/funny-animals/blue-bird-emoticons/801-list…
	/>Scott Pruitt 🦀 Is Killing Us 🤬 [/center]
	Thursday, April 26, 2018
	By William Rivers Pitt, Truthout \| Op-Ed
	[img
	width=50]
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-13041…
	/>
	http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/44286-scott-pruitt-is-killing-us
	[/quote]
	#Post#: 10160--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:42 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	[quote author=AGelbert link=topic=264.msg9560#msg9560
	date=1524788363]
	[img
	width=100]
	https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/545693884664119297/mCDJfUgm.jpeg[/img]
	Make Nexus Hot News part of your morning: click [i]here
	http://climatenexus.us4.list-manage1.com/subscribe?u=d1f5797e59060083034310930&…
	/>to subscribe.[/i]
	April 26, 2018
	[img
	width=990]
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-12121…
	[center]Who�s 😈 🦕 🦖 Behind The Institute
	for Pension Fund Integrity?[/center]
	Yesterday, Oil Change International�s Andy Rowell wrote about a
	mysterious new group advocating against pension divestment (h/t
	DeSmog). Rowell sorts through the few clues available on the
	group to connect the dots about who�s behind the campaign--and,
	unsurprisingly, his findings display [size=12pt]a pattern all
	too familiar to those familiar with fossil-fueled front groups.
	Rowell�s search was instigated by a piece in the trade
	publication Institutional Investor last week (headline: �New
	Pensions Group Says Forget About Climate Change�), which
	reported on a new report by the Institute for Pension Fund
	Integrity (IPFI). The purpose of this group, Institutional
	Investor explains, is to counter the divestment campaign that�s
	been fairly successfully calling on pensions to take their money
	out of fossil fuel companies, and instead have them focus only
	on returns.
	The IPFI report�s author is Christopher Burnham, a former UN
	undersecretary and Connecticut state treasurer. Compared to the
	obvious oil shills that usually run these sorts of programs,
	Burnham�s resume looks almost credible. Of course, he also
	served as the chairman of a PR company, Cambridge Global
	Advisors and asan �energy investment banker,� according to
	Rowell--but neither of these positions offer an obvious red
	flag.
	More concerning than Burnham�s background is that contact
	information listed on the group�s website changed earlier this
	month, from pointing to Burnham to directing users to contact
	Fred Wollenberg of the advertising company Bergman Group.
	Bergman doesn�t seem to be too tightly linked to the oil
	industry (though the group does produce daily illustrations for
	the American Enterprise Institute�s 🦖 magazines).
	Wollenberg himself, however, has worked with Exxon as well as
	DCI group, an organization whose astroturfing Bloomberg has
	exposed. While Rowell stresses that these links could just be a
	coincidence, it�s worth remembering DCI is also the group that
	ran the fake news blog TechCentral Station back before fake news
	was cool, and funded an amateur-looking Al Gore climate attack
	ad.
	Rowell points to a recent Bloomberg story about how DCI
	registered the website for a different anti-divestment campaign,
	Protect our Pensions. Perhaps that�s just a coincidence, too.
	;)
	So is Wollenberg the man in the middle, working on behalf of DCI
	and its funders to set up this other group seeking to protect
	pensions from divestment? Someone should certainly try and shine
	a light on the situation.
	There�s little reason to insist on investing in fossil fuels,
	even if you believe an investor�s only concern should be
	returns. Because for years now, it is increasingly true that
	divested portfolios will out-perform their dirty competitors, in
	part because good environmental and social governance practices
	prove profitable.
	So if divesting isn�t going to reduce returns, what excuse could
	IPFI possibly have for defending fossil fuels? If it�s just that
	they�re funded by the industry, well then that�s no different
	than a pencil-maker advocating for pen-shuns. [/size]
	[center][center][img
	width=440]
	https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CCi1IdQWYAAcO5Y.jpg[/img][/center][/center]
	[/quote]
	#Post#: 10161--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:43 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	[quote author=AGelbert link=topic=264.msg9562#msg9562
	date=1524794294]

	http://therealnews.com/t2/templates/gk_twn/images/logo3.png
	April 25, 2018
	[center]EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt's 'Days Are Numbered' for
	Ethics Violations [img width=70
	height=40]
	http://cliparts.co/cliparts/Big/Egq/BigEgqBMT.png[/img][/center]
	The ethics violations of Scott Pruitt keep mounting and now he
	has become too toxic for even the White House, says Todd Paglia,
	executive director of Stand Earth
	[center]
	https://youtu.be/wlqJqGD8Z0U[/center]
	Todd Paglia is the Executive Director of Stand.earth, an
	environmental advocacy organization that focuses on protecting
	forests.
	Before joining Stand.earth, Todd was an attorney for Ralph
	Nader, focusing on consumer protection issues such as
	environmental purchasing by governmental agencies to spur
	alternative markets, enforcement of antitrust laws, corporate
	welfare issues and corporate accountability.
	He received his Bachelor of Arts from Binghamton University,
	SUNY, his J.D. from the New England School of Law, and his LL.M.
	from George Washington University, National Law Center, in
	Environmental Law and Policy.
	http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=7…
	[/quote]
	#Post#: 10162--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:47 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	[quote author=AGelbert link=topic=264.msg9600#msg9600
	date=1525381704]
	[font=times new roman]National Parks Conservation
	Association[/font]
	BLOG POST Mark Wenzler Jan 5, 2018
	[center]Willfully Ignoring Climate Change Is a Disaster for
	National Parks[/center]
	[center]Trump administration 😈 repeals climate-smart
	management policies for national parks.[/center]
	SNIPPET:
	It�s no secret that the Trump administration is pursuing an
	aggressively pro-fossil fuels energy policy. Dating to the
	election campaign, he talked about rolling back federal efforts
	to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which Trump blamed for
	killing coal and oil jobs, and he has loudly followed through on
	that promise ever since.
	What�s not as well-known is that the administration is not only
	refusing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, it is willfully
	preventing federal land managers from taking steps to protect
	our national parks and other public lands from the disastrous
	effects of climate change.
	Full article:
	https://www.npca.org/articles/1724-willfully-ignoring-climate-change-is-a-disas…
	[center][img
	width=400]
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-07111…
	[/center]
	[font=times new roman]National Parks Conservation
	Association[/font]
	BLOG POST Mark Wenzler Apr 10, 2018
	[center]We Cannot Stand By While the National Park Service
	Attacks Climate Science [img
	width=50]
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-13041…
	[center]Altering a climate report sets an unacceptable precedent
	for national park decision-making.[/center]
	SNIPPET:
	[center][img
	width=800]
	https://npca.s3.amazonaws.com/images/11801/3b286167-9302-4458-aa5d-f981a5205cbb…
	Sunset over the Anhinga Trail at Everglades National Park, one
	of many sites around the country that could be severely affected
	by sea level rise due to climate change. Photo � Justin A
	Lyden/Dreamstime.
	Last week, The Center for Investigative Reporting revealed that
	it had obtained copies of an 87-page draft report by a
	University of Colorado scientist on how sea level rise is
	affecting 118 coastal national parks. In this unreleased report,
	which has been delayed for publication by at least 10 months, a
	National Park Service official had edited the copy to remove all
	references to the human role in altering the climate.
	In contrast, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke 🐉 had assured
	members of Congress at a hearing last month that he did not know
	of any document that had been willfully changed to alter facts.
	�I read them all,� he was reported as saying. �I don�t change a
	comma on them.�
	http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-030815183114.gif<br
	/>
	But last week�s report contradicts that claim and casts
	additional doubt on his department�s integrity.
	[size=14pt]If true, this is the first known example of a Park
	Service report that has been edited to alter scientific
	information. This terrible precedent � the alteration of
	current, known scientific evidence � may have serious
	implications for how our national parks are managed.
	Our coastal parks are literally on the front lines of climate
	change. Last year�s devastating hurricane season showed how much
	damage severe weather and flooding can do to treasured places
	like Virgin Islands, Everglades and Biscayne National Parks and
	the communities that surround and depend on them. Park managers
	need the best science available to understand how to protect
	these parks from sea-level rise. They cannot build ecological
	resilience and prevent future damage if the data they are using
	is manipulated and inaccurate or lacks evidence that may support
	future solutions.[/size]
	Full article: [img
	width=50]
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-13041…
	/>
	https://www.npca.org/articles/1805-we-cannot-stand-by-while-the-national-park-s…
	[move][I][font=impact]The Fossil Fuelers 🦖 DID THE
	Clean Energy Inventions suppressing, Climate Trashing, human
	health depleting CRIME,[COLOR=BROWN] but since they have
	ALWAYS BEEN liars and conscience free crooks 🦀, they are
	trying to AVOID [/color] DOING THE TIME or PAYING THE FINE!
	Don't let them get away with it! Pass it on!
	[/font][/I][/move]
	[/quote]
	#Post#: 10163--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:55 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	May 5, 2018
	[center]Industry 🦖 Trumps Communities in WV
	http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-200714183337.bmp[/cen…
	Local efforts to regulate waste from natural gas in West
	Virginia have been blocked by industry and state government,
	according to a new report, and illustrate how the natural gas
	industry is winning local fights across the country.
	The latest investigation from ProPublica's Local Reporting
	Network in partnership with the Charleston Gazette-Mail shows
	how Fayette County, which is still dealing with lingering
	pollution left by the coal industry, sought to prevent further
	damage from the gas industry by passing a local ordinance
	prohibiting disposal of drilling waste.
	An industry giant 🦖 quickly sued, and a district judge
	🐒 threw out the county's ban on waste
	disposal--mirroring similar efforts in other states, which have
	"almost uniformly been thrown out by the courts." 🤬
	https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/wv_troubled_transition/fayette-county-learne…
	[center][img
	width=400]
	http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/judge_dees.jpg[/img][/…
	[center][img
	width=400]
	http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-011214192628.png[/img…
	#Post#: 10164--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:56 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	[center][img
	width=40]
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-13041…
	/>Elon Slows Tesla Down �
	http://www.coh2.org/images/Smileys/huhsign.gif
	To Cut Out The
	Financial Trolls
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-13041…
	/>
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-04081…
	[/center]
	May 6th, 2018 by Zachary Shahan
	EXCELLENT article! 🌟
	https://cleantechnica.com/2018/05/06/147392/
	Agelbert COMMENT: The fact that a lot of fossil fuel money is
	funding those short sellers should be repeated with a megaphone
	📢 on a regular basis.
	The Fossil Fuel Industry desperately needs to kill EV sales in
	general and Tesla EVs in particular.
	WHY⁉️
	It is no secret that refineries will be lose their profit margin
	if the fuel portion of the refined crude coming out of their
	cracking towers is not marketable. That portion, by the way,
	represents an added cost for the oil refineries as hazardous
	waste to be disposed of. Rockefeller used to flush it down the
	rivers in Pennsylvania back in the late 19th century, killing
	horses and cows down the river from his refinery. The farmers
	there were up in arms about Rockefeller's "business practices".
	Externalizing pollution costs 😈 is an old habit the
	Fossil Fuel Industry 🐉🦕🦖 depended on
	from the start to make a profit 💵 🎩 (over
	people and planet, of course),
	For those who think the refineries can just adjust the product
	percentages from crude to increase the lubricant,
	plastics/pharmaceuticals/esticide/fertilizers/textiles feed
	stock and reduce the fuel portion to keep the profits going, let
	me say that is not an option for them.
	That is another factor that is of utmost concern to the fossil
	fuel industry, though they go out of their way to avoid
	discussing it in public. That is the FACT that crude oil
	refining is inelastic in regard to product percentages. IOW you
	will always get about (it can vary somewhat, but very slightly)
	the same percentage of heavy lubricants, lighter lubricants,
	fuels from diesel on up to gasoline and then the gases like
	propane and methane, along with all the poisonous VOCS that get
	flared that the EPA 😈 is trying desperately to ignore.
	[center][img
	width=640]
	http://storage.sherwoodparknews.com/v1/dynamic_resize/sws_path/suns-prod-images…
	Pollutants aside for a moment, the crude oil feed stock for
	plastics, medicines, fertilizers, paints, etc. represents less
	than 6% worldwide of all crude oil products. THAT is a drop in
	the bucket and never was, regardless of the lies and propaganda
	from the fossil fuel industry, a big part of the profit
	equation. It has ALWAYS been about getting us to BURN FUEL.
	Consequently, a vanished market for gasoline and diesel means
	bankruptcy for the fossil fuel industry.
	[center][img
	width=140]
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-25111…
	Those polluting fuels and gases will always be produced when
	crude oil is refined. They can't just flush them into rivers
	like Rockefeller did in Pennsylvania in the 19th century before
	he created a market for his pollutants by saving Ford from
	bankruptcy in return for having the Ford carburetors run on
	gasoline INSTEAD of ethanol (which was the original plan by
	Ford).
	Gasoline is what made Rockefeller rich. Without a market for
	gasoline or gases, the huge profit from selling them is
	converted into a massive unavoidable cost of handling over 40%
	per barrel of refined crude as hazardous waste. ⁉️
	The fossil fuel industry CANNOT survive unless it keeps talking
	us into buring fossil fuels, period. They know that, but they do
	not want anybody else to know that. 🕵️
	The inelastic oil refinery product percentage (i.e. what comes
	out of those cracking towers after a de-oxygenated barrel of
	crude (de-oxygenating crude is a massively energy intensive
	process that they have deliberately left out of ALL the
	calculations for energy return on energy invested for crude oil)
	is the elephant 🐘 in the fossil fuel business model
	room.
	The Fossil Fuel Industry "business model", when all the energy
	and pollution costs are considered, was always unjustified. They
	got away with it through massive welfare queen subsidy hand-outs
	from government while using the air, water and land as pollution
	dumping areas for over a century.
	Tesla is a HUGE threat to the Fossil Fuel Industry. Don't
	believe for a second that the polluters are not resorting to
	absolutely every low down Wall Street trick they can
	underhandedly fund to stop Tesla from destroying them.
	Musk's Tesla is destroying the Fossil Fuel Propaganda Lies we
	have been subjected to for over a century by bringing sanity
	into our Energy use, whether at home or on the road. [img
	width=70]
	http://cliparts.co/cliparts/Big/Egq/BigEgqBMT.png[/img]<br
	/>
	[quote]GlennM
	To me the core innovative technology of TSLA is battery
	abilities, the cars depend on good and cheap batteries, the next
	big thing RE storage depends on it, Electric semi's, grid and
	home storage, electric aircraft etc all depend on the ability to
	mass produce high quality (good energy density and cycle life )
	batteries.
	Everything depends on that
	The key take away for me from the conference call is that they
	have the ability to make M3 battery packs in 17 minutes now and
	expect to quadruple battery deliveries this year. Once the Cars
	are satisfied the battery factory can print money by making
	powerwalls. They are years ahead of everyone else. You can argue
	that the big four can make car bodies quicker and are more
	experienced, but you cannot argue that anyone can make better
	batteries cheaper or now faster.
	Cars, trucks,Powerwalls, even solar roof tiles, are all just a
	way to package and sell batteries.
	For this alone TSLA is worth the valuation and will probably go
	far higher.
	I agree with the commentary that the Shorts are destroyers they
	are the maggots that feed and thrive on decay and need failures
	to make money. The sooner Elon can leave them behind the better
	as he will never change their minds or their "business"
	practices.
	I believe that this will happen this year, we will see a $400
	valuation by EOY and higher next. The future will get the last
	laugh.[/quote]
	[center]
	[img
	width=60]
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-25081…
	#Post#: 10165--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:57 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	[center][img
	width=60]
	http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-13041…
	/>Musk Has Had It With Wall Street & The Financial Markets (Good
	!)
	[img
	width=30]
	http://www.createaforum.com/gallery/renewablerevolution/3-141113185047.png[/img…
	/>[/center]
	May 5th, 2018 by Maarten Vinkhuyzen
	ANOTHER EXCELLENT article:
	https://cleantechnica.com/2018/05/05/musk-has-had-it-with-wall-street-the-finan…
	#Post#: 10166--------------------------------------------------
	Re: Hydrocarbon Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus
	By: AGelbert Date: July 2, 2018, 5:58 pm
	---------------------------------------------------------
	[center][img
	width=640]
	https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/dc/d5/f1/dcd5f1ac950c860ad7839325f4ea…
	[center]"IT'S A SCAM!!!" Senator Sheldon Whitehouse's BRILLIANT
	Takedown of the Koch Brothers🦕🦖 & Donald Trump
	🦀 [/center]
	[center]
	https://youtu.be/YYH3xrAt-lo[/center]
	Dose of Dissonance
	Published on Apr 24, 2018
	Senator Sheldon Whitehouse delivers a fiery speech on the
	corrupting influence of "creepy billionaires!" BUY TRUMP TOILET
	PAPER!
	http://amzn.to/2Fe08tb
	(Affiliate Link)
	Support Dose of Dissonance's mission @
	https://www.patreon.com/DoseofDissonance
	*****************************************************
	Previous Page
	Next Page