Random thought of the day:

	Random thought of the day:

	On kvothe's phlog index [1], the warning "The actual content is
	guaranteed to be of dubious quality." I have similar appraisals of
	my own work and I hope tob [2] would approve the creation of the
	Dubious Gopher Committee. If asked I would gladly warm a seat in
	said committee.

	Tomasino [3] and Christy [4] are contemplating categorizing gopher
	phlog entries for Burrow. In the phost, tomasino suggests tags as
	a potential solution to this problem. I started out tagging my
	entries and then omitted them because effort. I still think this
	is a direction I will ultimately go, with tags linking to relevant
	entries and whatnot. So today marks a return of tags, to be
	completed in a future project. Once again, effort...

	I think that I'm finally honing in on the style that I prefer. In
	my previous entry [5], I dismissed the thought of providing a text
	only entry due to the duplication of data. Looking at the problem
	with a fresh set of eyes, I saw how obvious the solution was, and
	will be offering a text only version [0] which should be
	compatible with Gopher(tm) brand gopherowzers (and friends) with
	long gophermaps.

	My only question for you, dear reader, is whether you prefer the
	text-only link at the bottom along with the others, or at the
	top for immediate access for the afflicted gopher clients?
	Stylistically I prefer it at the bottom in a single location, but
	I do prefer function over form. Or am I catering to a tiny subset
	of the gopher audience, myself included?

	Today it will be at the bottom, but please let me know if you have
	an opinion.

	Tags: #dubious #dgc #categorization #tags #gopher #formatting

	[0] Text-only version
	[1] gopher://sdf.org/1/users/kvothe/phlog
	[2] gopher://sdf.org/1/users/tob
	[3] gopher://sdf.org/1/users/tomasino/phlog/20180306-burrow-evolves
	[4] gopher://sdf.org/1/users/christyotwisty/phlog
	[5] gopher://sdf.org/0/users/dokuja/phlog/20180304