Permacomputing II
-----------------

Today I was looking for a terminal font which could display various
esoteric Unicode blocks, and stumbled upon the UNSCII fontset[1].
Reading the webpage, I noticed that the domain, viznut.fi,
was strangely familiar.  I went to the homepage, and, yes,
indeed!  These fonts are by the same person who coined the term
"Permacomputing".  As if that weren't serendipitous enough, the
*same* person is responsible for the "Robotic Liberation" VIC-20
demoscene production that I enjoyed watching ten years ago or so!
A prolific fellow, to be sure.

I was surprised and excited to see that Viznut had taken notice
of the fact that his Permacomputing post was received with such
enthusiasm in various circles and has written quite a bit of follow
up material since then.  For some reason I had utterly failed to
realise he was an active participant in these discussions.  Anyway,
here is some really excellent looking stuff that I can't wait to
read and digest that I wanted to share with people who may like me
have also missed it when it appeared in in 2021 and 2022:

* Permacomputing update 2021 [2]
* Of computing and growth [3]
* Digital esthetics, environmental change and the subcultures of
 computer art [4]
* Maximalism and Virtualism [5]

I'm really glad that these ideas and discussions are taking root.
There seems to be a bit of a Cambrian explosion of terminology going
on at the moment, which is not surprising, and it also seems like
"permacomputing" is on track to become the most widely used umbrella
term (see the end of section 1 of "Permacomputing update 2021").
I understand why, it's an undeniably catchy term.  I've kind of
personally gone off it just a little, though, and wanted to briefly
explain why.  I promise it's not because I want my own "radically
sustainable computing" to supplant it!  That's an awkward mouthful.

The term permacomputing is coined in analogy to permaculture.
Permaculture is, in turn, a portmanteau from "permanent agriculture".
It's been retconned to mean "permanent culture", but I think
it still retains a strong connotation of being concerned with
food production (which, sure, is not the exclusive domain of
agriculture).  I have no beef with permaculture at all (ha ha).
It is basically the question of "how do we feed ourselves long
term without destroying the planet".  Human beings need to eat.
Always have, always will.  It's a question of existential importance.
And we managed to successfully stop ourselves from starving out of
existence for hundreds of thousands of years before the advent of
intensive mechanised agriculture.  So there's very good reason to
believe the question can be solved.

But computing is not existentially important.  Not even close.
I still believe the quote below, which I wrote in late 2020 in my
"radically sustainable computing" post[6].  And not only is computing
not existentially important, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever
to believe that anything like what most people today would recognise
as computing can be made sustainable on a timescale measured in
millennia.  Sure, some kind of hand-cranked Babbage engine might
fit the bill, but that's not the kind of thing the permacomputing
community is, for the most part, talking about.

"Permacomputing" as an idea is both orders of magnitude less
important and less likely than permaculture, and we should keep
them far apart in our heads, I would argue.  But I grant this is
a petty quibble.  Like I said, I'm happy these discussions are
happening, they are important, and I plan to keep engaging with
them.  I'm not trying to discourage anything.  I just can't shake
this feeling that there's a kind of "horse before the cart" thing
going on here.  It's 100% predictable that when a bunch of hardcore
computer nerds who have grown up fetishising the idea of general
purpose computing become seriously concerned with sustainability
questions they desperately try to reform the thing they love
rather than discard it.  I'm as guilty of that as anybody else.
But "reduce" comes before "reuse" and "recycle".  The greenest
possible computer is a lot less green than no computer at all.
The first thing we need to figure out is what, if anything, do we
need computing for at all.  I'll write more about this in future.
There's already been some great discussion along these lines in
the Merveilles Town forum, framed under the provocative question
"What are computers for, anyway?"[7].

Finally, that quote:

> Within living memory, millions of people lead daily lives not
> touched by computing in any way, and while those lives may not have
> been perfect, it would be hard to argue that a lack of computation
> was the main contributing factor to that imperfection.

[1] http://viznut.fi/unscii/
[2] http://viznut.fi/texts-en/permacomputing_update_2021.html
[3] http://viznut.fi/texts-en/computing_and_growth.html
[4] http://viznut.fi/texts-en/digital_esthetics.html
[5] http://viznut.fi/texts-en/maximalism_virtualism.html
[6] gopher://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space:70/0/~solderpunk/phlog/discussions-toward-radically-sustainable-computing.txt
[7] https://forum.merveilles.town/thread/35/what-are-computers-for%2c-anyway%3f-38/

You are viewing proxied material from zaibatsu.circumlunar.space. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.