Subj : Re: "Sources said"
To : Kurt Weiske
From : Aaron Thomas
Date : Mon Jul 14 2025 05:13 pm
KW> That's a common deflection tactic around here. state a position and when
KW> confronted, pretend you don't understand the argument.
Part of the problem is people who don't quote, and the other problem is that I'm here to discuss things and not to bash others.
KW> BH>> The purported list contains the names of people whome he flew out to KW> BH>> "Epstein Island".
KW>
KW> > I appreciate that explanation, but I'm still wondering: how was the lis KW> > assembled and why?
KW>
KW> How does that matter to this discussion?
How does it not matter? What makes a piece of paper with words on it so important? Do you realize that there's such a thing as handwritten lies?
My main question remains unanswered: Why would a criminal write a diary of his crimes? How smart would that be? If such a document exists, law enforcement can investigate it, but a piece of paper with words on it doesn't provide red-handed proof of anything.
Suppose I write on a piece of paper: "Kurt Weiske conspired in the killing of JFK," then I bury it in a time capsule. Years later, when they dig it up, do you think you'll have cops banging on your door?