Subj : Re: Import tariff's
To : Brent Hendricks
From : IB Joe
Date : Fri Jul 04 2025 05:24 am
On 03 Jul 2025, Brent Hendricks said the following...
BH>
BH> Except for one problem. Cases "in general" do not immediately come
BH> before the supreme court. The cases start in the lower courts, then
BH> work their way through the appellate courts. Then SCOTUS makes the
BH> ultimate ruleing on weather the lower/appealate courts ruling is
BH> ultimately constitutional.
BH>
BH> So saying the lower Federal Judge overstepped their bounds is a bit
BH> disingenuous. As they are the first cog in the machinary.
BH>
It's the way the constitution wrote their authority. They sited the constitution in their decision...
For 250 years its worked that way. A district judge hears a case and makes a decision and if people don't like that decision it gets appealed.
The Justices said... You can only decide on THAT case because THAT'S all the authority you have, as per the constitution.
BTW, its not disingenuous when that is the wording from the Supreme Court.
BTW, Again... There is a video out where Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan was on camera apposing this District Court Judges, doing the same to Biden, then only later to support them because it was against Trump.
So... To use your analogy of cogs in the machinery...
250 years of working fine. It may take time but it works fine.
For 246 years Presidents have signed Executive Orders/Actions... Note the 4 years there was an Auto-Pen signing them without knowledge... And the 1-2-3 court system has worked fine. for 250 years...
IB Joe, Pronouns (FJB/LGB)
AKA Joe Schweier
SysOp of 4A 6F 65 73 42 42 53
-=JoesBBS.com=-
... There is an exception to every rule, except this one.
