Subj : Re: next question.
To   : Chris Hoppman
From : Scott Adams
Date : Mon Jan 12 2004 12:16 am

-=> Quoting Chris Hoppman to Scott Adams <=-

SA>         In modern machines with gighz machines and such it
SA>         really isn't that much unless your doing a data hog
SA>         like a Database program.  But a rule of thumb basically
SA>         anything is better with pointers.  The main benefit is
SA>         data storage of course but speed helps.
SA>         So it depends on how many records you might be dealing with.
SA>         A few hundred who cares.  A million then yeah use pointers. :)

CH> How, about 2-10 records at a time.  The program is okay when one user
CH> is on  the bbs, but when a second or third user is on the bbs then it
CH> is all hell  tring to type something in the telnet client.  The keys
CH> seem like they stick. (Wait a few seconds, before they get printted to
CH> the screen).

    IF only 2-10 then nah pointers not mandatory.  But if your running
    say a million records and USE 2-10 at a time then reding with
    pointers might help.

CH> The ansi screens scrolls about 3 lines then pauses then scrolls two
CH> more then  pauses then scrolls 5 more (not in that order, but in
CH> general it does that). When two users are online.  It sucks and I am
CH> looking to resolve the issue of  cpu usage then maybe speed up the
CH> program.

    OH ...I see...a multi-user board yes definitely needs timeslices.





... Sinclair - "Your `noble citizens' have stolen credit chips."
--- Fringe BBS
* Origin: EWOG II - The Fringe - 904-733-1721 (1:112/91)