Subj : Still using OS/2?
To : Jean-Claude Dumas
From : mark lewis
Date : Thu Jul 30 2015 01:10 pm
29 Jul 15 08:32, you wrote to Alan Ianson:
AI>> Not anymore, but I have fond memories of OS/2. I was looking at the
AI>> ecs website not long ago wondering if I should do the deal. It's not
AI>> inexpensive and you have to also pay more for each core.
JD> Yea, if money was no object, it would be interesting. Makes one wonder
JD> why it's so expensive...
ummm... antiques are expensive... rare items are expensive...
AI>> Not useless at all, always was and still is good for FTN stuff. I can
AI>> do all the FTN stuff on my linux box that I ever did on OS/2, but I
AI>> have lost the ease of running dos doors that I had with OS/2.
JD> True enought. DOS/Win support have been the strong as well as the weak
JD> point of OS/2. And I believe that if IBM had released 2.0 with the UI
JD> of 1.3 instead of delaying it to get the WPS ready, things might have
JD> been different. Windows 3.0 would may have been seen as a cheap OS/2
JD> knockoff, who knows? Timing is everything and MS did beat IBM.
m$ beat IBM because IBM didn't know how to support all the millions of little
people... IBM's base was in big iron and the $$$$$ they could charge for
support...
JD> It's all so easy in hindsight, isn'it? :)
in many cases, yep!
)\/(ark
... A bore is a man who, when asked how he is, tells you.
---
* Origin: (1:3634/12.73)