Subj : The Nodelist Revisited
To   : Bill Birrell
From : Scott Little
Date : Tue Dec 31 2002 04:46 pm

[ 31 Dec 02 00:17, Bill Birrell wrote to Scott Little ]

BB>     Scott, I have very little to say. All you had to say was that the
BB> system you advocate would run in parallel with the standard
BB> distribution nodelist.

My first message to you was:

BB>> The nodelist cannot be significantly altered or superseded while we
BB>> are still using the term FidoNet anyway. To do so would just cut off
BB>> everyone who depends on the nodelist as it is.

SL>Extracting the subset of information that is supported by SLF from a
SL>superior format is trivally easy.  Nobody has ever suggested
SL>cutting off those that depend on SLF.

If you couldn't understand what I said above, a simply "Huh?" would have
sufficed.  Instead you started crapping on about the apocalypse..


-- Scott Little  [fidonet#3:712/848 / [email protected]]

--- FMail/Win32 1.60+
* Origin:  Cyberia: All your msgbase are belong to us! (3:712/848)

You are viewing proxied material from vert.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.