Subj : human-readable nodelist format
To : andrew clarke
From : Jasen Betts
Date : Mon Nov 11 2002 06:26 am
Hi andrew.
10-Nov-02 16:19:32, andrew clarke wrote to Scott Little
ac> Sun 2002-11-10 10:44, Scott Little (3:712/848) wrote to andrew
ac> clarke:
>> St Louis and XML both enforce proper structure in the format
>> itself, without relying on ignorable rules in the specification.
>> (and eventually someone will try an alternate use for the Uplink,
>> you watch)
ac> If there are rules in the spec, they can't be ignored!
I don't see why that is... people ignore other rules in the current
nodelist... I've seen hubs that were uncontactable... that sort of thing.
ac> I don't know what alternate use people would use for the Uplink
ac> keyword, but it won't matter, because the spec won't allow them
ac> to. And anyone using broken software that doesn't comply to the
ac> spec would be risking being denodelisted until they stop using it
ac> presumably
you might think.
-=> Bye <=-
---
* Origin: 16 Km East of TV's "Croc Hunter" (3:640/531.42)