Subj : human-readable nodelist format
To   : Rick Van Ruth
From : andrew clarke
Date : Sun Nov 10 2002 10:00 pm

Sun 2002-11-10 18:41, Rick Van Ruth (3:640/954) wrote to andrew clarke:

>>> I had a look at the nodelist it generated, but sorry I don't agree
>>> with the fields, but then I guess you haven't yet decided the final
>>> format.

ac>> You'll have to tell me what you don't agree with specifically,
ac>> otherwise I've got no reason to change it!

> I don't see any difference over the current listing method, the exact
> same information appears in your format with the only difference
> (except for "Parent") is that is is listed in lines and has the
> field names present.

> What advantage does this give?

The same information appears in my format to allow it to be converted to St
Louis format.  But there are additional fields to allow BinkP nodes to be
described adequately.  And scope to allow other methods of communication.  I
thought my proposal explained that.

> Also what is the point of having "Parent"?

To allow nodes to be listed in any order in the HRL.

-- [email protected]

--- Msged/NT 6.1.1
* Origin: Blizzard of Ozz, Mt Eliza, Victoria, Australia (3:633/267)

You are viewing proxied material from vert.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.