Subj : areafix bug?
To : mark lewis
From : Stephen Walsh
Date : Tue Apr 14 2020 09:24 am
Hello mark!
13 Apr 20 08:40, you wrote to me:
SW>> The mail hub system process mail just a few seconds after it's
SW>> dropped off.
ml> cool... i wasn't sure... some systems (still) use scheduled processing
ml> instead of instant...
The hub system runs as a vps on my server in a datacentre, so has plenty of
bandwidth and cpu power to do
processing right away. #_)
SW>> I have done a test from my bbs system, and it receives the
SW>> message about not fiding +ALL as well, so it's not Tom's system
SW>> at fault.
ml> ok... i know we found some few problems here and there with his mailer
ml> setup that we got fixed... missing directories here and there and a
ml> few other things... we got that all fixed and we were able to test
ml> direct netmail between our systems... had tried before but scott's
ml> system bounced my routed reply because tom wasn't in the nodelist
ml> yet... that should be a non-problem pretty soon, i guess ;)
It's taken Tom (you) untill the easter weekend to get things working. I was
waiting for him to get inbound binkp
sessions going before submitting the new net segment. That only happended on
sunday.
SW>> this issue wasn't present in versions before 1.0.7.13, as I've
SW>> had nodes use the %+ALL before.
ml> yeah, sounds like a bug in recent versions... i saw vince posted about
ml> another bug, too... but anyway, hope you guys find and kill this bug
ml> pretty easily :)
So do I, as a lot of new nodes use that when siging up. #-)
