Subj : Zoom anyone?
To : Borax Man
From : Richard Menedetter
Date : Sun May 03 2020 07:26 pm
Hi Borax!
03 May 2020 07:20, from Borax Man -> Richard Menedetter:
RM>> They ARE designed for it for a long time.
BM> Yes, for a long time this mistake has festered.
We agree to disagree :)
BM> The issue is that we are reimplementing gui elements over HTTP, and
BM> this has meant having to bolt on functionality. I used to use quite a
BM> few web based apps at work, now none. What used to be a web based apps
BM> is now dedicated client programs using a crossplatform toolkit like
BM> QT.
I did not mean that it is the best solution for everything.
But there are a lot of really, really good usecases.
BM> We will continue to see complex websites, such as YouTube, Jitsi,
BM> there will always be rich web portals, but we will see fewer
BM> applications unrelated to a website using browsers.
I do not know.
99% of the programs I use privately are browser and terminal.
I used to use a specialized mailclient, now I use webmail.
RM>> For example ChromeOS runs all its apps in the browser.
RM>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrome_OS
BM> Is it a proper OS, or an appliance?
I do not use it, so I am not that familiar.
But it seems that it is a small linux system, where linux is hidden, and the only shell is the browser.
It is used to view webpages and to run applications.
BM> What I was referring to are things like web based Material Resource
BM> Management programs, Quality Management programs and other enterprise
BM> applications.
At work we have a lot of webapps.
Most of them are not very well made.
But usually because they did not put in a lot of effort, or they used really bad SAP Webthingy (whatever that is called.)
But naturally I agree that huge specialized applications can be better optimized if they are local apps.
But something like this is still extremely powerful:
https://www.freephototool.com/
CU, Ricsi
... It is better to have a permanent income that to be fascinating.
--- GoldED+/LNX
* Origin: A friend is someone who knows me and likes me anyway. (2:310/31)
