Subj : Candidates vision request
To : mark lewis
From : Markus Reschke
Date : Sun Dec 09 2018 07:32 pm
Hi Mark!
Dec 09 11:33 2018, mark lewis wrote to Markus Reschke:
MR>> So it would extract additional addresses which aren't intended for
MR>> binkp for a node entry following the FTSC docs (if listed take just
MR>> the address in the IBN flag).
ml> wrong... it extracts the domain from the "system name" field, the INA
ml> flag(s) and the IBN flag(s)... the domains listed in the "system name"
ml> field and the INA flags are default domains to attempt a connection
ml> with... they are valid to use if the domains attached to any IBN flags
ml> fail to connect...
Sorry, you got that totally wrong. We're talking about the way multiple
addresses are listed in the IBN and INA flags. And we found out that there are
two ways, one documented in a FTSC doc and the other one undocumented.
