Subj : FTS-1 and FTS-4
To : mark lewis
From : Markus Reschke
Date : Fri Nov 09 2018 06:30 pm
Hi Mark!
Nov 09 11:16 2018, mark lewis wrote to Andrew Leary:
AL>> FTS-1 really could be split into several documents. The stored
AL>> message definition section is useful information, but not absolutely
AL>> required for a FTS-1 compatible implementation.
ml> this is why other proposals like the Hudson Message Base format and
ml> others were discussed to be placed as reference documents in the
ml> library and specifically not set as FTSC standards... putting them in
ml> the library was to aid others as to the workings of them but not to
ml> exhibit them as a FTSC standard... i remember discussion about it but
ml> do not recall if the documents were actually written and archived...
AFAIK, there aren't any of the messagebase formats in the FTSC library, besides
classic *.MSG.
