Subj : Re: RIP
To : Ward Dossche
From : Carol Shenkenberger
Date : Sun Jun 08 2025 10:43 pm
Re: Re: RIP
By: Ward Dossche to Alex Galiyev on Mon Jun 02 2025 10:33 pm
> Alex,
>
> AG> I agree, but all it takes is an effort to find a development team. No on
> AG> has ever inquired about it, this is how the degradation started.
>
> You want new exciting things to be produced?
>
> Write them yourself, distribute them, see if people like it in which case it
> will be used. That's the only way how change works.
>
> AG> Understood. My criticism of his ZC duties implies: total ignorance, not
> AG> taking excommunication cases seriously, him asking to pay him a salary
> AG> and much more. Reasonable?
>
> I'm not the first ZC who stated you wanted him to do a job, that he ought to
> paid. You probably missed that.
>
> AG> Bizarre is when he allows nodelist entries like this, when Crimea belong
> AG> to Ukraine:
> AG> Pvt,16,Aelita_Station,Simferopol_Russia,Vlad_Shvedovich,-Unpublished-,30
>
> I think the RCs of R45 R46 and R50 plus myself have placed ourselves above t
> conflict in Ukraine. Once it gets resolved, and eventually it will, these RC
> will take care of the nodelist if there is a need for it.
>
> We're not going to have a war imported here ... it happened previously and I
> appreciate it not to happen anymore. We are sysops united by a hobby.
>
> \%/@rd
>
Yes. What is missing is each zone has always had ways that worked well for
them. There is no reason why they have to be the exact same.
EX: When I moved the last of Z6 to Z3, it was not to a geographically 'closest
area' but with the agreement of Z3c, to the one that had proven the most widely
connectable to the nodes moving. That was the most southerly part of Z3.
Zones often work more about 'connectable' than geography if the 2 come
in conflict.
