Subj : Re: The US election
To   : Rob Swindell
From : jimmylogan
Date : Sun Nov 10 2024 12:33 pm

-=> Rob Swindell wrote to jimmylogan <=-

>  RS> No. The fact that different moral authorities among the human
>  RS> population claim different, incompatible sets of moralities and that
>  RS> these moralities have evolved and changed over the years, proves that.
>  RS> There is not "one set of laws" (or morals) that rules all of mankind
>  RS> now and forever. --

> So does that mean that yours are not absolute either? And other can
> have a differing opinion?

RS> I think that's obvious.

> So to me the life should be saved - that is no less a valid moral
> claim that yours, right?

RS> Sure. But I'm not wanting to force anyone to have an abortion, while
RS> you're wanting to force others to have unwanted births. I don't think
RS> morals have validity. A religion, socity, individual can believe that
RS> the genitals of young women should be mutilated to prevent sexual
RS> gratification. It's a moral belief that someone holds. Is it valid or
RS> invalid? Who's to say. I know I don't want that for my family though,
RS> so I vote against crap like that. --
RS>                                             digital man (rob)

Okay. Since you don't see the unborn as valid life, then we'll never come
to an agreement. At least I know where you stand.




... Please no deja vu; I don't want to go through that again.
--- MultiMail/Mac v0.52
* Origin: Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com (1:105/7)

You are viewing proxied material from vert.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.