NB> On Wed Dec 06 2017 19:01:32, mark lewis wrote to Nicholas Boel:
NB>NB>> I would think if a false positive shows up, it's *not* working as
NB>NB>> designed. YMMV, though.
NB>ml> that's not a bad binary... that's a bad signature...
NB> Whatever it is, it's not working right.. and they're not answering the
NB> requests to fix it. That's a problem.
This isn't meant as a criticism, but why hang your hat on one antivirus program
when there are more of them? I haven't used Linux since Mandrake, so that's
the onlu experience I have with it.
