Subj : Re: %HELP ?
To : Mark Lewis
From : Nick Andre
Date : Wed Jan 18 2017 10:28 pm
On 18 Jan 17 20:20:34, Mark Lewis said the following to Nick Andre:
ML> so what happens when 229/400 joins and is also connected to /100, /200 and
ML> /300 when they do the rescan? i thinkg that's the point that wilfred was
ML> trying to make but he was making it from the POV of a fidoweb system that i
ML> connected to more than one system for the same area without the entire
ML> distribution being fully connected to all other systems in the fidoweb...
Illogical. If 229/400 was already connected to 100, 200 and 300 for ABC echo,
then 400 was already receiving messages from them, so a rescan would only
produce duplicates, which would be caught and zapped provided all four have
properly configured systems and/or four Sysops who can keep their fingers off
a configuration when it "just works". Can all four do it? Maybe not...
Unless I'm hitting a language-barrier with Wilfred, I'm getting the impression
its all doom-and-gloom because D'Bridge allows rescans and uses SEEN-BY
checking to determine a rescan or not. It reads as if this software is being
singled out and not Gecho, TBBS, Fastecho or others *that do it the same way*
D'Bridge is not everyone's cup of tea, but I refuse to have someone proclaim
the sky is falling after drinking my tea... My teas are not THAT potent.
ML> exactly... yet we have others working on ""hidden"" agendas trying to chang
ML> the entire methodology of FTN mail distribution to fit their non-standard w
ML> of interconnections...
My agenda is to run a reliable uncensored mail Hub until either I or the
equipment expires, and I don't give a jack-crap about other agendas or
politics. Many people use my services and DB in both NAB and Fidoweb
topologies. I am personally trusted by many Sysops for this and other reasons.
Nick
--- Renegade vY2Ka2
* Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
