Subj : Re: EU rejects claims of
To   : RUG RAT
From : Mike Powell
Date : Sun Aug 31 2025 09:47 am

> more in criminal cases.  Expanded in the early 20s to make taking pictures of
> "women" in swim suits at a public beach. Making it a sex crime if you being
> there with a camera made them feel uncomfortable.  Penalties include large
> fines, jail, and or chemical castration.

Beaches are a good place to take pictures of many other things... lighthouses,
sunsets... that have nothing to do with whoever is there.  I usually try to
ignore other people... being tagged for a sex crime just because my camera
makes them uncomfortable is going way too far.

> "Defamation using truth".  Speaking ill of someone, even if true can lead to
> large fines and jail.

So if they do something bad, and you just tell what they did without
opinion, it could be defamation?  Consider the state of things right now, I
am surprised we don't have one like this.

> A lot of these laws do nothing to protect the public but are used by the
> business conglomarates (Chibol), or government officals to hide their dirty
> business in the shawdows, or stifle public commnet.

Figures.

Mike

* SLMR 2.1a * Anything good is either illegal, immoral or fattening.
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

You are viewing proxied material from vert.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.