Subj : SBBS/W32 Kermit SABOTAGE
To   : MICHEL SAMSON
From : Stephen Hurd
Date : Fri Nov 05 2004 02:37 pm

 Re: SBBS/W32 Kermit SABOTAGE
 By: MICHEL SAMSON to STEPHEN HURD on Fri Nov 05 2004 08:06:00

>      I have ignored Rob Swindell's `Kermit' SABOTAGE for over a year, in
> hope the situation would improve somehow.  I couldn't avoid the need for
> an UpDate since at least two SysOps complained about Rob's setup lately,
> not to mention the BBSers who are completely mystified by this SABOTAGE.

I still fail to see how including a setup that happens to do the job (ie:
transfer files) using Kermit is a form of sabotage.  It's been tested with
Kermit95, C-Kermit and G-Kermit.  I'm fairly certain that even you have managed
to transfer files using that setup and MS-Kermit (note: This is based on
memory, not fact of any sort)  I'm *positive* that winston Smith... another
MS0Kermit user has manager to transfer files using the Kermit protocol as
included with Synchronet.

I'm still waiting to hear exactly what "$hareWare" Rob is "forcing" sysops to
use.
--- SBBSecho 2.10-FreeBSD
* Origin: FreeBSD Synchronet - telnet://FreeBSD.synchro.net (1:140/17)

You are viewing proxied material from vert.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.