Subj : Re: Floyd
To : GREGORY DEYSS
From : TIM RICHARDSON
Date : Fri Aug 14 2020 08:36 pm
On 08-08-20, DALE SHIPP said to GREGORY DEYSS:
-=> On 08-07-20 13:24, Gregory Deyss <=-
-=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Floyd <=-
DS> It depends. If it were always a deadly weapon, then why bother using it
DS> instead of a gun? It is only a deadly weapon in some situations -- and
DS> this was not one of them.
The state in which this happened had previously ruled a taser a *deadly
weapon*!
GD> Because Dale. Brooks ... did ... have ... a ... gun ...
DS>Really? That is not in any of the reporting. Enlighten us all as to
DS>your evidence that he had a gun during the incident that led to his
DS>being shot in the back.
Shipp likes to whip words and twist facts in an attempt to play the lefties'
favorite game; a never-ending flow of BS till the person he's aiming his crap
at gets tired of having to counter all his mis-information and stops talking
on whatever subject he's infusing false info into.
GD> There is no area of confusion or no ability to twist either, when it
GD> fits your narrative. You can't have it both way when it suits you.
GD> The District Attorney ruled that the use of a taser "IS" a deadly
GD> weapon.
DS>Quote the ruling. When is a taser a deadly weapon?
See; "The state in which this happened had previously ruled a taser a *deadly
weapon*.
DS>I do not believe
DS>that it can be considered as such when discharged randomly in the air
DS>from a considerable distance. Site the ruling that shows I am wrong.
DS> I did not see or hear that in the video -- show me the time spot where
DS> it occurred.
GD> Again the video can be found at
GD>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5QEnGkIbzA
GD> 1:34 and then from there it shows in detail what those charges were.
DS>OK since it was not on the video in question, you dug up some other
DS>video by a youtube blogger. I'm sure that if one searches enough they
DS>can come up with some source to say anything they want to say. In any
DS>case, looking at time 3:12 the blogger goes on to claim that the DA has
DS>declared that a taser is a deadly weapon. He presents a chart from the
DS>GA code that he claims supports his statement. However, it explicitly
DS>outlines conditions under which an object might result in a charge of
DS>aggravated assault. That article doe not mention a taser, and for the
DS>case in question the taser as discharged by Brooks does not fit the
DS>definition in the statue. It was not discharged in a manner that did or
DS>could result in serious bodily harm.
DS>Try again if you can come up with a credible source.
An argument with a leftie democrat is an endless (and useless) endeavor.
It doesn't matter what the actual facts are, a leftie will twist the real
facts and also make up their own.
Why bother?
Tagline;
"LOOTING: When free housing, free food, free education, and free phones are
just not enough!"
---
*Durango b301 #PE*
* Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)