Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Bringing Capital Accumulation Back In: The Weapondollar-Petrodollar...
by:
Jonathan Nitzan
Shimshon Bichler
Thumbnail
Download
Web page
This paper offers an alternative approach to the repeated
occurrence of Middle East energy conflicts. Our analysis
centres around the process of differential capital
accumulation, emphasizing the quest to exceed the normal
rate of return and to expands one's share in the overall
flow of profit. With the evolution of modern capitalism,
the dictates of differential accumulation become an ever
stronger unifying force, drawing both state managers and
corporate executives into increasingly inextricable power
driven alliances.
The Middle East drama of oil and arms since the 1970s has
been greatly affected by this process. On the one hand,
rising nationalism and intensified industry competition
during the 1950s and 1960s forced the major oil companies
toward a greater cooperation with the OPEC countries. The
success of this alliance was contingent on the new
atmosphere of scarcity and oil crisis, which was in turn
dependent on the progressive militarization of the Middle
East. On the other side of the oil arms equation stood
the large U.S. and European based military contractors
which, faced with heightened global competition in
civilian markets and limited defense contracts at home,
increased their reliance on arms exports to oil rich
countries.
Over the past quarter century, the progressive
politicization of the oil business, together with the
growing commercialization of arms transfers helped shape
an uneasy Weapondollar Petrodollar Coalition between the
principal military contractors and petroleum companies.
As their environment became intertwined with the broader
political realignment of OPEC and the industrial
countries, the differential profits of these companies
grew evermore dependent on the precarious interaction
between rising oil prices and expanding arms exports
emanating from successive Middle East energy conflicts.
At the same time, these companies were not passive
bystanders. This is suggested firstly by the very close
correlation existing between their arms deliveries to the
Middle East and the region's oil revenues and, secondly,
by the fact that every single energy conflict since the
1967 Arab Israeli War could have been predicted solely by
adverse setbacks to the differential profit performance
of the large oil companies!
Date Published: 2025-04-27 02:55:53
Identifier: bnarchives_0013
Item Size: 71478384
Language: English
Media Type: texts
# Topics
arms
exports
accumulation
capital
capitalism
conflict
corporation
crisis
distribution
elite
energy
finance
globalization
growth
imperialism
GPE
liberalism
Middle East
military
national interest
neoliberalism
new
world
order
oil
OPEC
ownership
peace
power
profit
ruling class
security
stagflation
state
stock market
technology
TNC
United States
US
violence
war
Bichler & Nitzan Archives
# Collections
opensource
# Uploaded by
@blair_fix
# Similar Items
View similar items
PHAROS
You are viewing proxied material from tilde.pink. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.