ERIC ED340078: How Educational Are the Educators: A Content Analysi... | |
by ERIC | |
Thumbnail | |
Download | |
Web page | |
A study investigated the extent to which forensic judges | |
used educational comments when writing ballots. A total | |
of 140 informative speaking ballots were collected from | |
tournaments in Mississippi, Colorado, and Arkansas. After | |
the ballot comments were sorted into five categories | |
(basic comments, educational comments, descriptive | |
comments, personal comments, and questions), the coded | |
information was entered into the Statistical Package for | |
the Social Sciences (SPSS) computer statistics program. | |
The SPSS program was used to figure the percentage of | |
each categorized comment per ballot, and the average of | |
each category overall. Results showed that basic comments | |
made up almost one-half (47%) of the comments, followed | |
by educational comments (30%), and with the other 3 | |
categories totaling 22% of all comments. This meant that | |
over two-thirds of all comments were non-educational in | |
nature. Results also showed a definite relationship | |
between ballot rank and the number of comments in | |
specific categories. Results imply that the only way to | |
solve the problems of inadequate comments on judging | |
ballots is through awareness and training, as some judges | |
are unaware of the importance and value of educational | |
comments. Three approaches may help to overcome these | |
problems; (1) provide ballot inserts that explain how to | |
effectively write comments; (2) offer judging workshops; | |
and (3) allow extra time for judges to write comments. | |
(PRA) | |
Date Published: 2014-11-02 22:34:40 | |
Identifier: ERIC_ED340078 | |
Item Size: 21087248 | |
Language: english | |
Media Type: texts | |
# Topics | |
ERIC Archive; Content Analysis; Debat... | |
# Collections | |
ericarchive | |
additional_collections | |
# Uploaded by | |
@chris85 | |
# Similar Items | |
View similar items | |
PHAROS | |