Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Anaheim Police Go On A Rampage Against Citizens
Thumbnail
Download
Web page
The Post-Aurora "Rampage" Few Have Heard About
Description courtesy William Grigg
lewrockwell.com
July 22, 2012
One day after a lethal shooting rampage in Aurora,
Colorado left twelve people dead and scores injured,
another eruption of criminal violence left one dead and
several others injured in Anaheim, California. The
perpetrators of the second assault were officers from the
Anaheim Police Department, who used "non-lethal" rounds -
such as rubber bullets, which are reliably lethal at
close range - to disperse a spontaneous protest that
coalesced after the "officer-involved shooting" of a
young man in the neighborhood.
Cell phone video of the police assault shows a wall of
officers in riot gear directing "non-lethal" fire at a
group of unarmed and terrified civilians - including
several small children, who were shielded by a man who
appeared to be their father. Another officer unleashed a
police dog, which immediately attacked a stroller
containing an infant. A bystander who interposed himself -
and was mauled by the dog for doing so - probably saved
the child's life.
Those acts, in which private citizens protected the
innocent from criminal violence at the hands of the
State's armed servants, were just as heroic as those of
the three men in Aurora who died protecting their
girlfriends during the shooting rampage.
Local news accounts, which retailed the department's
version of events, described the crowd as unruly and the
protest as a "near-riot" in which angry citizens
"encircled" the officers and "began throwing things,
including bottles and possibly rocks, at them," in the
words of a Los Angeles Times report. The police also
claimed that "several fires" had been started in
trashcans. None of those claims have been been
corroborated by video evidence or eyewitnesses. Nor have
the police explained why the police gunned down the young
man, referred to only as "Stomper," after he and two
others fled when approached by the cops.
Immediately after the shooting, several residents
confronted the police to demand answers. The Anaheim PD -
sensing an ominous tremor of righteous outrage on the
part of a neighborhood that has endured seven "officer-
involved shootings" this year - reverted to type as an
army of occupation: Within a matter of minutes, the
unarmed protesters were outnumbered by heavily armed cops
in body armor.
In the wake of the Aurora massacre, the public has been
encouraged to believe that because of private gun
ownership, every public gathering place can be
transformed into the scene of a massacre. The Anaheim
police rampage illustrates how quickly the State's armed
enforcement caste - which, according to "gun control"
activists, should have a monopoly on firearms - can turn
any neighborhood into an urban war zone.
UPDATE - It appears that the incident leading to the
protests was a man being shot in the back of the head by
police - i.e., an apparent street execution. Additional
information and a video of military-style supression of
protests that followed is downloadable below.
----------------------------------
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 241 [Enforcement of
Constitutional Rights]
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress,
threaten, or intimidate any person in any State,
Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the
free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege
secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United
States, or because of his having so exercised the same;...
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than ten years, or both; and if death results from
the acts committed in violation of this section or if
such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, ...
or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned ... or may be sentenced to death.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States
Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment
prohibits the making of any law respecting an
establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of
religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on
the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to
peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a
governmental redress of grievances.
=======================================
Learn More:
If You See Something, Film Something - The Improtance
of Videotaping Police[1]
Police State III: Total Enslavement - Alex Jones[2]
Atlanta police seize camera, try to suppress footage of
raid - Copwatch of East Atlanta[3]
Don't talk to the police[4]
FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted material
the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of criminal justice, political, human
rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social
justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair
use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If
you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must
obtain permission from the copyright owner.
References
1. IfYouSeeSomethingFilmSomething-TheImprotanceOfVideotapingPolice
2. PSIIITE
3. AtlantaPoliceSeizeCameraTryToSuppressFootageOfRaid
4. TalkingToThePolice
Date Published: 2012-07-22 18:11:04
Identifier: AnaheimPoliceGoOnARampageAgainstCitizens
Item Size: 100389946
Media Type: movies
# Topics
police; videotape; mayhem; assault; p...
# Collections
offcenter
deemphasize
# Uploaded by
@obamadocuments
# Similar Items
View similar items
PHAROS
You are viewing proxied material from tilde.pink. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.