A Critique and Analysis of the Arguments over the Closure and Openi...

	A Critique and Analysis of the Arguments over the Closure and Openi...
	Thumbnail
	Download
	Web page

	The issue of opening (infit ) or
	closure (insid d) of the doors of legal reasoning (ijth
	d) has
	been one of the age-old and wide-ranging questions with
	the Sunnis that has
	been prevalent through history with each one of the
	opening and closure having
	found their own advocates and each having brought up
	their arguments to prove
	their claim. A group of the earlier and later Sunni
	jurists have inclined
	toward closure and most of the contemporaries have
	accepted this perspective
	too and have come to believe in closure of the door of
	ijtih d,
	especially the absolute independent ijtih d. In contrast,
	this theory has not
	been accepted by a group of the earlier and later jurists
	and they have opined
	for the permissibility and even the obligation of ijtih d
	upon the
	qualified, while the later jurists have made the most
	attempts to prove the
	opening. The present article has undertaken to explore
	the course of opinions
	in this respect and has concluded through comparative
	study and by critique,
	analysis, and examining that from among the above-
	mentioned theories what seems
	to be more logical and appropriate is the opening of the
	door of ijtih d.



	Date Published: 2024-09-27 20:40:24
	Identifier: 11.3.emami
	Item Size: 12902713
	Language: per
	Media Type: texts

	# Topics
	ijtihād
	Sunni jurisprudence
	closure
	opening.

	# Collections
	journals_contributions
	journals

	# Uploaded by
	@journal_of_fiqh_and_usul

	# Similar Items
	View similar items

	PHAROS