Turning the tide on drug policy: Why re-criminalizing is not the answer and the urgent need for health-centered approaches
------------------------------------------------------------------
Feb. 26, 2024
The debate around the complex issue of drug decriminalization and
its impact is multi-faceted, with strong arguments on both sides.
However, the path toward re-criminalizing recreational drug use is
a step backward, not forward. The case of Oregon's Measure 110
illustrates the rocky road of decriminalization marred by
implementation challenges. Yet, it underscores a pivotal truth:
Substance abuse is a public health issue that requires a
health-based approach, not punitive measures.
First and foremost, I stand opposed to the re-criminalization of
recreational drug use. Our history is littered with the failures of
the war on drugs—a costly, ineffective campaign that has done
more to inflame the issues it sought to extinguish than to provide
any real solution. Re-criminalization is merely another chapter in
this ineffective approach, failing to address the root causes of
drug abuse and addiction.
One can't discuss this issue without scrutinizing Oregon's Measure
110. Its implementation was flawed from the start, with
decriminalization taking effect before the promised funding for
addiction recovery services materialized. Whether due to
incompetence or sabotage, the outcome was the same: a haphazard
execution that left vulnerable populations at risk. The narrative
of Measure 110's implementation serves as a cautionary tale,
highlighting the essentiality of synchronized policy execution.
Treating substance abuse as a public health issue is the only
sensible path forward. Police and jails, with their punitive
infrastructure, are ill-equipped to address the nuanced needs of
individuals grappling with substance abuse. This isn't just about
treating addiction; it's about reshaping our societal approach to
dealing with drug misuse from one of punishment to one of care and
rehabilitation.
Moreover, the current model of criminalizing drug use exacerbates
the overburdening of our legal system. Redirecting funds into the
hiring and training of community health workers and social workers
not only presents a more humane solution but is also more
cost-effective. The misstep by the Portland Police Bureau, as
reported by Street Roots newspaper, in failing to include the
addiction recovery hotline number on citation forms is emblematic
of the systemic failures in addressing substance abuse through law
enforcement.
A shift away from the punishment-and-retribution model is crucial.
The state must commit to funding robust, evidence-based risk
reduction and substance abuse recovery services in every county.
The costs of recriminalization—both financial and social—dwarf
those associated with providing adequate public health services.
It’s high time we reject the facile, politically expedient
"solutions" that only serve to exacerbate the problem.
The half-measure of decriminalizing drugs without legalization has
indeed perpetuated problems, most notably the persistence of the
narcotics black market. This black market, without the checks and
balances of regulation, has ushered in dangerous substitutes like
fentanyl, contributing to a surge in overdoses. A regulated market
could mitigate these risks, providing quality-controlled
substances, cutting the ground from under criminal syndicates, and
opening additional revenue streams for the state.
Lastly, the racial and economic justice dimensions of drug policy
cannot be overstated. The long-term impacts of criminal records on
housing, education, employment, and for non-U.S. citizens, the risk
of deportation, are profound. A shift towards a health-based
approach to drug policy could significantly mitigate these
disparities, promoting a more equitable society.
In conclusion, Oregon’s Measure 110, despite its flawed
execution, sets a precedent for a much-needed national
conversation. We must move beyond punitive measures and embrace a
health-centered approach to substance abuse. The cost of
inaction—or worse, regression to re-criminalization—is too
high. It’s time for a paradigm shift, one that recognizes the
complexity of addiction and meets it with compassion, effective
public health policy, and a commitment to social justice.
(Full disclosure: This article was rewritten by artificial
intelligence based on a rough draft I wrote with key talking
points, to fit within a 750-word limit and to be more easily
readable. The thoughts are original and mine, but the AI
reorganized, edited, and rewritten them. The edit was therefore
more extensive than my typical writing, which is only checked by
Grammarly.)
