| ,,, Wang VS | |
| This was a very Unique OS, I have seen nothing similar to | |
| it at all. | |
| What follows are some notes I remember about it. I used | |
| and developed on this OS for over 18 years, but my memory | |
| is a bit fuzzy. | |
| * The hardware was very robust. By that I mean it the | |
| hardware could be abused to the point were other | |
| vendors' hardware would have failed. I have seen | |
| these systems in computer rooms that were constantly | |
| kept above 95F (35C), water dripping on them from | |
| a leak roof for hours on end, dust everywhere. | |
| These were perfect for manufacturing environments. | |
| * Only 2 type of files, Indexed (ISAM) and Consecutive | |
| (Text). | |
| * Record Sizes can be set as Fixed or Variable Length. | |
| * Consecutive could be looked at as UNIX Byte Streams, | |
| but not really. | |
| * A Flag could be set to allow the File to be | |
| compressed or uncompressed. | |
| * Backups were performed to 9 tack reel tapes. | |
| Also the multiple CRC Errors on restore will give | |
| you a good reason to drink :) | |
| * Disk Drives were call Volumes. | |
| * Only 1 "Directory Level". On the VS these were | |
| called "Libraries". | |
| * Max Library and File Name Size was 8 characters. | |
| * No lowercase characters. | |
| * There is no concept of a "Command Line", all | |
| activates where accomplished via TUI Screens. | |
| * No such things as "file extensions". | |
| * Instead of saying "I deleted a file", one would say | |
| "I scratched a file". That was very common usage | |
| for people and customers using the VS. | |
| * Users did not have what one would call a home | |
| directory. | |
| * If I remember correctly, you set Volume/Library/File | |
| Access based upon user ID (it has been a while). | |
| * Development tools were quite good, you had 2 full | |
| screen editors, "EDIT" an "ADEPT", plus a number of | |
| code generation tools. | |
| * Creating TUI screens were trivial, easier than | |
| anything I have seen since. TUI Screen Creation on | |
| the VS puts UNIX curses to shame. Also, the screen | |
| generators on SAP where terrible when compared to | |
| what the VS had. | |
| * The Terminals you connected to the VS were not dumb | |
| but I think an 8 bit tiny computer. | |
| * When Microsoft Windows came out, Wang created an GUI | |
| Application you could use to connect to the VS from | |
| your PC. | |
| * There was a database system called "PACE", with PACE | |
| you could create a very complex business application | |
| within 2 days. The tools were very smart, I have | |
| seen nothing as powerful or easy since. It is too | |
| bad PACE was not ported to other Systems. | |
| * These were pre-internet systems, but could be | |
| networked using WSN (Wang System Numbers). | |
| * Kind of odd, but you could execute Wang WP on the VS. | |
| Supported languages: | |
| ==================== | |
| * COBOL | |
| * FORTRON | |
| * PL/1 | |
| * C | |
| * assembler, rather similar to IBM Mainframe assembler. | |
| * Procedure Language, a powerful scripting language. | |
| * There were others that I have since forgotten about. | |
| Wang VS Procedure Language Examples | |
| SHA512 for "Wang VS Procedure Language Examples" | |
| $Id: gophermap,v 1.5 2024/10/15 13:05:47 jmccue Exp $ |