======================================================================
= Systemic functional grammar =
======================================================================
Introduction
======================================================================
Systemic functional grammar (SFG) is a form of grammatical description
originated by Michael Halliday. It is part of a social semiotic
approach to language called 'systemic functional linguistics'. In
these two terms, 'systemic' refers to the view of language as "a
network of systems, or interrelated sets of options for making
meaning"; 'functional' refers to Halliday's view that language is as
it is because of what it has evolved to do (see Metafunction). Thus,
what he refers to as the 'multidimensional architecture of language'
"reflects the multidimensional nature of human experience and
interpersonal relations."
Influences
======================================================================
Halliday describes his grammar as built on the work of Saussure, Louis
Hjelmslev, Malinowski, J.R. Firth, and the Prague school linguists. In
addition, he drew on the work of the American anthropological
linguists Boas, Sapir and Whorf. His "main inspiration" was Firth, to
whom he owes, among other things, the notion of language as system.
Among American linguists, Whorf had "the most profound effect on my
own thinking". Whorf "showed how it is that human beings do not all
mean alike, and how their unconscious ways of meaning are among the
most significant manifestations of their culture".
From his studies in China, he lists Luo Changpei and Wang Li as two
scholars from whom he gained "new and exciting insights into
language". He credits Luo for giving him a diachronic perspective and
insights into a non-Indo-European language family. From Wang Li he
learnt "many things, including research methods in dialectology, the
semantic basis of grammar, and the history of linguistics in China".
Basic tenets
======================================================================
Some interrelated key terms underpin Halliday's approach to grammar,
which forms part of his account of how language works. These concepts
are: system, (meta)function, and rank. Another key term is
lexicogrammar. In this view, grammar and lexis are two ends of the
same continuum.
Analysis of the grammar is taken from a trinocular perspective,
meaning from three different levels. So to look at lexicogrammar, it
can be analyzed from two more levels, 'above' (semantic) and 'below'
(phonology). This grammar gives emphasis to the view from above.
For Halliday, grammar is described as systems not as rules, on the
basis that every grammatical structure involves a choice from a
describable set of options. Language is thus a 'meaning potential'.
Grammarians in SF tradition use system networks to map the available
options in a language. In relation to English, for instance, Halliday
has described systems such as 'mood', 'agency', 'theme', etc. Halliday
describes grammatical systems as closed, i.e. as having a finite set
of options. By contrast, lexical sets are open systems, since new
words come into a language all the time.
These grammatical systems play a role in the construal of meanings of
different kinds. This is the basis of Halliday's claim that language
is 'metafunctionally' organised. He argues that the raison d'être of
language is meaning in social life, and for this reason all languages
have three kinds of semantic components. All languages have resources
for construing experience (the 'ideational' component), resources for
enacting humans' diverse and complex social relations (the
'interpersonal' component), and resources for enabling these two kinds
of meanings to come together in coherent text (the 'textual'
function). Each of the grammatical systems proposed by Halliday are
related to these metafunctions. For instance, the grammatical system
of 'mood' is considered to be centrally related to the expression of
interpersonal meanings, 'process type' to the expression of
experiential meanings, and 'theme' to the expression of textual
meanings.
Traditionally the "choices" are viewed in terms of either the content
or the structure of the language used. In SFG, language is analysed in
three ways (strata): semantics, phonology, and lexicogrammar. SFG
presents a view of language in terms of both structure (grammar) and
words (lexis). The term "lexicogrammar" describes this combined
approach.
Metafunctions
======================================================================
From early on in his account of language, Halliday has argued that it
is inherently functional. His early papers on the grammar of English
make reference to the "functional components" of language, as
"generalized uses of language, which, since they seem to determine the
nature of the language system, require to be incorporated into our
account of that system." Halliday argues that this functional
organization of language "determines the form taken by grammatical
structure".
Halliday refers to his functions of language as metafunctions. He
proposes three general functions: the 'ideational', the
'interpersonal' and the 'textual'.
Ideational metafunction
=========================
The ideational metafunction is the function for construing human
experience. It is the means by which we make sense of "reality".
Halliday divides the ideational into the logical and the experiential
metafunctions. The logical metafunction refers to the grammatical
resources for building up grammatical units into complexes, for
instance, for combining two or more clauses into a clause complex. The
experiential function refers to the grammatical resources involved in
construing the flux of experience through the unit of the clause.
The ideational metafunction reflects the contextual value of 'field',
that is, the nature of the social process in which the language is
implicated. An analysis of a text from the perspective of the
ideational function involves inquiring into the choices in the
grammatical system of "transitivity": that is, process types,
participant types, circumstance types, combined with an analysis of
the resources through which clauses are combined. Halliday's 'An
Introduction to Functional Grammar' (in the third edition, with
revisions by Christian Matthiessen) sets out the description of these
grammatical systems.
Interpersonal metafunction
============================
The interpersonal metafunction relates to a text's aspects of 'tenor'
or interactivity. Like field, tenor comprises three component areas:
the speaker/writer persona, social distance, and relative social
status. Social distance and relative social status are applicable only
to spoken texts, although a case has been made that these two factors
can also apply to written text.
The speaker/writer persona concerns the stance, personalisation and
standing of the speaker or writer. This involves looking at whether
the writer or speaker has a neutral attitude, which can be seen
through the use of positive or negative language. Social distance
means how close the speakers are, e.g. how the use of nicknames shows
the degree to which they are intimate. Relative social status asks
whether they are equal in terms of power and knowledge on a subject,
for example, the relationship between a mother and child would be
considered unequal. Focuses here are on speech acts (e.g. whether one
person tends to ask questions and the other speaker tends to answer),
who chooses the topic, turn management, and how capable both speakers
are of evaluating the subject.
Textual metafunction
======================
The textual metafunction relates to 'mode'; the internal organisation
and communicative nature of a text. This comprises textual
interactivity, spontaneity and communicative distance.
Textual interactivity is examined with reference to disfluencies such
as hesitators, pauses and repetitions.
Spontaneity is determined through a focus on lexical density,
grammatical complexity, coordination (how clauses are linked together)
and the use of nominal groups. The study of communicative distance
involves looking at a text's cohesion�that is, how it hangs together,
as well as any abstract language it uses.
Cohesion is analysed in the context of both lexical and grammatical as
well as intonational aspects with reference to lexical chains and, in
the speech register, tonality, tonicity, and tone. The lexical aspect
focuses on sense relations and lexical repetitions, while the
grammatical aspect looks at repetition of meaning shown through
reference, substitution and ellipsis, as well as the role of linking
adverbials.
Systemic functional grammar deals with all of these areas of meaning
equally within the grammatical system itself.
Children�s grammar
======================================================================
Michael Halliday (1973) outlined seven functions of language with
regard to the grammar used by children:
*the instrumental function serves to manipulate the environment, to
cause certain events to happen;
*the regulatory function of language is the control of events;
*the representational function is the use of language to make
statements, convey facts and knowledge, explain, or report to
represent reality as the speaker/writer sees it;
*the interactional function of language serves to ensure social
maintenance;
*the personal function is to express emotions, personality, and
�gut-level� reactions;
*the heuristic function used to acquire knowledge, to learn about the
environment;
*the imaginative function serves to create imaginary systems or ideas.
Relation to other branches of grammar
======================================================================
Halliday's theory sets out to explain how spoken and written texts
construe meanings and how the resources of language are organised in
open systems and functionally bound to meanings. It is a theory of
language in use, creating systematic relations between choices and
forms within the less abstract strata of grammar and phonology, on the
one hand, and more abstract strata such as context of situation and
context of culture on the other. It is a radically different theory of
language from others which explore less abstract strata as autonomous
systems, the most notable being Noam Chomsky's. Since the principal
aim of systemic functional grammar is to represent the grammatical
system as a resource for making meaning, it addresses different
concerns. For example, it does not try to address Chomsky's thesis
that there is a "finite rule system which generates all and only the
grammatical sentences in a language". Halliday's theory encourages a
more open approach to the definition of language as a resource; rather
than focus on grammaticality as such, a systemic functional
grammatical treatment focuses instead on the relative frequencies of
choices made in uses of language and assumes that these relative
frequencies reflect the probability that particular paths through the
available resources will be chosen rather than others. Thus, SFG does
not describe language as a finite rule system, but rather as a system,
realised by instantiations, that is continuously expanded by the very
instantiations that realise it and that is continuously reproduced and
recreated with use.
Another way to understand the difference in concerns between systemic
functional grammar and most variants of generative grammar is through
Chomsky's claim that "linguistics is a sub-branch of psychology".
Halliday investigates linguistics more as a sub-branch of 'sociology'.
SFG therefore pays much more attention to pragmatics and discourse
semantics than is traditionally the case in formalism.
The orientation of systemic functional grammar has served to encourage
several further grammatical accounts that deal with some perceived
weaknesses of the theory and similarly orient to issues not seen to be
addressed in more structural accounts. Examples include the model of
Richard Hudson called 'word grammar'.
See also
======================================================================
*Systemic linguistics
*Thematic equative
Other significant systemic functional grammarians:
* Ruqaiya Hasan
* J.R. Martin
* C.M.I.M. Matthiessen
Linguists also involved with the early development of the approach:
* Randolph Quirk
* Richard Hudson
External links
======================================================================
* For more information, see the SFG web site at:
[
http://www.isfla.org/Systemics/ Systemic functional grammar]
* For a large bibliography containing the vast majority of systemic
functional writings, see the bibliography site at:
[
http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/anglistik/langpro/bibliographies/index.htm]
*
[
https://web.archive.org/web/20120204034806/http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/
wg.htm
Word grammar]
* [
http://manxman.ch/moodle2/course/view.php?id=4 Layman's
introduction: A simple description of using SFG techniques in language
and literacy tuition ]
License
=========
All content on Gopherpedia comes from Wikipedia, and is licensed under CC-BY-SA
License URL:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Original Article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemic_functional_grammar
