You have a system that works for you. It works for many. It's
admirable. I, on the other hand, do not. I consider preexisting
systems of logic to be mazes one must travel through to reach a
necessarily limiting set of goals.
But I, the American, get the TNT and blow up the library and
say, "look at all these pages! Everybody grab a page!"
So, I believe I understand where you're coming from in your
characterization of me. It's not invalid. I've also been
characterized as a "social anarchist" and I can't argue with
that either. It's valid enough. It's quite likely that I
represent everything you detest in modern scholarship as it
stands. I will stand proudly with my armor and fight to defend
as long as you wish, but you're welcome to a seat at the table.
I won't poison your food.
