True but still. It's something not to forget. Look at thought
experiments, commonly in use in education. They're fine as
limited educational tools to draw limited conclusions in a
limited field. But then people like to broaden to make
wide-ranging implications for reality. And then you run into a
problem: they're thought experiments. Constructed. Precise.
Fitting the criteria set aside in a closed universe situation
that may or may not fit reality as it is. In the case of this
video, it's _possible_. That's what's intriguing: It's
_possible_. But it's idealised. Fictionalized. We may know of
situations that 'seem similar' but are they? Family scenarios in
particular are often _very_ complicated things and while they
may seem to fall under scripted lines much of the time, there's
often far more at play than simplified plays designed to prove
specific points. Anyway, it's part of my overall rant against
stereotyping in general. A useful tool can sometimes be taken
too far and people base real life decisions on stereotyping
guidelines. Some lead to people dying. So, I go a little
overboard sometimes tongue emoticon
