RANDOM RANTDUMB Call it Quantum and you get people to go
  "oooh!".* sigh I read this.* Interesting read.* Looks very
  useful.* COULD it be called Quantum annealing?* Sure.* But it
  could also be called, *"HEY LET'S USE 2 VARIABLES instead of 1
  in the height dimension and make it shakey (quantum) so then we
  get... THREEEEE DIMENSIONS OOOOOOooooOOOooOOOo I hate BS wrapped
  up in spooky fundable terms like Quantum and Spin Glass
  (everybody loves Spin Glass now - all the rage; I like it too
  because it has... MEMORYYYY PROPERTIESSS.... just like
  USSSSSSssss".... [ so do a lot of things that we humans have*
  trouble writing the formulas to get math to predict ... because
  _MATH is fundamentally one dimensional itself ... ya-know... the
  *number line?* - and we get all spooked over Pi because it's
  circle drawn in TWO DIMENSIONSS........ and doesn't fit in 1
  dimension and cracks the number line.* duh . ] Not knocking math
  or the research... just the spookiness factor of it.* It's still
  cool but JUST CALL IT RANDOMIZED at key points instead of
  quantum and skip the BS.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_annealing#cite_note-8

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.