It *can* be, though. here is an example of an appropriate
re-direction:
Hamlet's tortured soul can be considered a response-dependent
morality, subjective, not necessarily relativist but certainly
anti-realist.
His famous line:
"*there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it
so.*
captures it well. From a moral realist standpoint of course,
Hamlet's torture is inconsequential to morality. But to a moral
anti-realist, quite consequential. No?
This is why the post should remain, although a shift in language
away from literature and psychology and towards philosophy is
appropriate.
