Well the process of removal - that's the question. We currently
have a few removal methods: prison and the criminal justice
system in general. There's also abortion, which is
self-selecting at present but there is also encouraged
miscarriages via doctors/families/society and such. ['can't
afford it / you're not smart enough to raise a child / the child
will have genetic defects - here's proof (waves paper with lots
of numbers) / 'it's a burden on society' (population growth
argument] etc.
I'm neither for nor against it; not being in a position to even
potentially carry, bear and give birth at present, it's just
hollow empty words out of my mouth... or rather, my opinion on
the issue should have more limited weight - just as any opinion
I have on parenting should have slightly lesser weight (no
matter *how* educated I may see myself), as my experience isn't
day-to-day but an outsider's POV.
I still give my opinions though
Anyway; I believe the genetics argument will grow in strength
and there's already some work on custom babies being done here
and there, afaik.
It'll be couched in positive terms but, in general, it's a form
of Eugenics.
Again, not that I'm against or for it; I don't know enough to
make a conclusion either way just yet.
My 'gut' would have separation taking place at the education
level; removal of the bell curve but a replacement of a
different type of monitoring system which includes potential
sociopathic tendencies. Separate schooling for they have
separate needs is my instinct.
I believe the "lessened conscience" serves a purpose in society
but they need special training that's different from more
empathic individuals.
