() The (What?) homunculus (What?) argument (DOING? DONE? DID?)
  is () a (What?) fallacy (What is ____ doing?) arising () most ()
  commonly () in () the (What?) theory () of (What?) vision (END
  OF LOOP.) . (What?) One () may (What did/will ____ DO?) explain
  () ( () human () ) (What?) vision () by (What is ____ doing?)
  noting () that (What?) light () from () the () outside (What?)
  world (What does ___ do?) forms () an (What?) image () on () the
  (What?) retinas () in () the (What?) eyes (If I add this part,
  will you believe me now?) and (What?) something () ( (If I add
  this part, will you believe me now?) or (What?) someone () ) ()
  in () the (What?) brain (What does ___ do?) looks () at () these
  (What?) images () as () if (What?) they (DOING? DONE? DID?) are
  (What?) images () on () a (What?) movie (What?) screen () ( ()
  this (What?) theory () of (What?) vision (DOING? DONE? DID?) is
  () sometimes (What was done to ____?) termed () the (What?)
  theory () of () the () Cartesian (What?) Theater () : (What?) it
  (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () most (What was done to ____?)
  associated () , () nowadays () , () with () the (What?)
  psychologist (What?) David (What?) Marr () ) (END OF LOOP.) . ()
  The (What?) question (What does ___ do?) arises () as (WHAT
  DIRECTION?) to () the (What?) nature () of () this () internal
  (What?) viewer (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) assumption ()
  here (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () that () there (DOING? DONE? DID?)
  is () a () 'little (What?) man () ' (If I add this part, will
  you believe me now?) or (What?) 'homunculus () ' () inside ()
  the (What?) brain (What is ____ doing?) 'looking () at () ' ()
  the (What?) movie (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) reason (0) why
  () this (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () a (What?) fallacy () may (0)
  be (What was done to ____?) understood () by (What is ____
  doing?) asking (0) how () the (What?) homunculus (What?) 'sees
  () ' () the () internal (What?) movie (END OF LOOP.) . () The ()
  obvious (What?) answer (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () that () there
  (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () another (What?) homunculus () inside
  () the () first (What?) homunculus () 's (What?) 'head () ' (If
  I add this part, will you believe me now?) or (What?) 'brain ()
  ' (What is ____ doing?) looking () at () this (What?) 'movie ()
  ' (END OF LOOP.) . (If I add this part, will you believe me
  now?) But (0) how (What does ___ do?) does () this (What?)
  homunculus (What did/will ____ DO?) see () the (What?) 'outside
  (What?) world () ' (END OF LOOP.) ? () In (What?) order (WHAT
  DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) answer () this () ,
  (What?) we (DOING? DONE? DID?) are (What was done to ____?)
  forced (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) posit ()
  another (What?) homunculus () inside () this () other (What?)
  homunculus () 's (What?) head (If I add this part, will you
  believe me now?) and () so () forth (END OF LOOP.) . () In ()
  other (What?) words () , (What?) we (DOING? DONE? DID?) are ()
  in () a (What?) situation () of () infinite (What?) regress (END
  OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) problem () with () the (What?)
  homunculus (What?) argument (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () that
  (What?) it (What does ___ do?) tries (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What
  did/will ____ DO?) account () for () a (What?) phenomenon () in
  (What?) terms () of () the () very (What?) phenomenon () that
  (What?) it (DOING? DONE? DID?) is (What was done to ____?)
  supposed (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) explain
  (END OF LOOP.) . (What?) Homunculus (What?) arguments () in
  (What?) terms () of (What?) rules () Another (What?) example
  (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () with (What?) cognitivist (What?)
  theories (0) that (What did/will ___ DO?) argue () that () the
  () human (What?) brain (What does ___ do?) uses (What?) 'rules
  () ' (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) carry () out
  (What?) operations () ( () these (What?) rules () often (What
  was done to ____?) conceptualised () as (DOING? DONE? DID?)
  being () like () the (What?) algorithms () of () a (What?)
  computer (What?) program () ) (END OF LOOP.) . () For (What?)
  example () , () in (Whose is it?) his (What?) work () of () the
  (What?) '50s () , (What?) '60s (If I add this part, will you
  believe me now?) and (What?) '70s (What?) Noam (What?) Chomsky
  (What did ___ do?) argued () that () ( () in () the (What?)
  words () of () one () of (Whose is it?) his (What?) books () )
  () human (What?) beings (What did/will ___ DO?) use (What?)
  Rules (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and (What?)
  Representations () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me
  now?) or (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (0) be () more () specific () ,
  (What?) rules (What is ____ doing?) acting () on (What?)
  representations () ) () in (What?) order (WHAT DIRECTION?) to
  (What did/will ____ DO?) cognise () ( () more () recently
  (What?) Chomsky (ATTACHED?) has (What was done to ____?)
  abandoned () this (What?) view () : (What?) c.f. () the ()
  Minimalist (What?) Program () ) (END OF LOOP.) . () Now () , ()
  in (What?) terms () of () ( (What did/will ____ DO?) say () )
  (What?) chess () , () the (What?) players (DOING? DONE? DID?)
  are (What was done to ____?) given (What?) 'rules () ' () ( ()
  i.e. () the (What?) rules () of (What?) chess () ) (WHAT
  DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) follow (END OF LOOP.) .
  () So () : (0) who (What does ___ do?) uses () these (What?)
  rules (END OF LOOP.) ? () The (What?) answer (DOING? DONE? DID?)
  is () self-evident () : () the (What?) players () of () the
  (What?) game () ( () of (What?) chess () ) (What did/will ___
  DO?) use () the (What?) rules () : (What?) it (DOING? DONE?
  DID?) 's () not () the (What?) case () ( () obviously () ) ()
  that () the (What?) rules (What?) themselves (What did/will ___
  DO?) play (What?) chess (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) rules
  (What?) themselves (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () merely () inert
  (What?) marks () on (What?) paper () until () a () human ()
  being (What?) reads () , (What does ___ do?) understands (If I
  add this part, will you believe me now?) and (What does ___ do?)
  uses (What?) them (END OF LOOP.) . (If I add this part, will you
  believe me now?) But (0) what () about () the (What?) 'rules ()
  ' (0) that (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () , () allegedly () , ()
  inside (Whose is it?) our (What?) head () ( (What?) brain () )
  (END OF LOOP.) ? (0) Who (What does ___ do?) reads () , (What
  does ___ do?) understands (If I add this part, will you believe
  me now?) and (What does ___ do?) uses (What?) them (END OF
  LOOP.) ? () Again () , () the () implicit (What?) answer (DOING?
  DONE? DID?) is () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me
  now?) and () , () some () would (What did/will ____ DO?) argue
  () , () must (0) be () ) () a (What?) 'homunculus () ' () : () a
  () little (What?) man (0) who (What does ___ do?) reads () the
  (What?) rules () of () the (What?) world (If I add this part,
  will you believe me now?) and () then (What does ___ do?) gives
  (What?) orders (WHAT DIRECTION?) to () the (What?) body (WHAT
  DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) act () on (What?) them
  (END OF LOOP.) . (If I add this part, will you believe me now?)
  But () again (What?) we (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () in () a
  (What?) situation () of () infinite (What?) regress () , ()
  because () this (What does ___ do?) implies () that () the
  (What?) homunculus (ATTACHED?) has () cognitive (What?) process
  (0) that (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () also (What?) rule (What?)
  bound () , (0) which (What does ___ do?) presupposes () another
  (What?) homunculus () inside (Whose is it?) its (What?) head ()
  , (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () so () on
  (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () so ()
  forth (END OF LOOP.) . () Therefore () , () so () the (What?)
  argument (What does ___ do?) goes () , (What?) theories () of
  (What?) mind (0) that (What did/will ___ DO?) imply (If I add
  this part, will you believe me now?) or (What did/will ___ DO?)
  state () explicitly () that (What?) cognition (DOING? DONE?
  DID?) is (What?) rule (What was done to ____?) bound () cannot
  (0) be () correct () unless () some (What?) way (DOING? DONE?
  DID?) is (What was done to ____?) found (WHAT DIRECTION?) to
  (What did/will ____ DO?) 'ground () ' () the (What?) regress
  (END OF LOOP.) . () This (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () important ()
  because (What?) it (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () often (What was
  done to ____?) assumed () in () cognitive (What?) science ()
  that (What?) rules (If I add this part, will you believe me
  now?) and (What?) algorithms (DOING? DONE? DID?) are ()
  essentially () the () same () : () in () other (What?) words ()
  , () the (What?) theory () that (What?) cognition (DOING? DONE?
  DID?) is (What?) rule (What was done to ____?) bound (DOING?
  DONE? DID?) is () often (What was done to ____?) believed (WHAT
  DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?) imply () that (What?)
  thought () ( (What?) cognition () ) (DOING? DONE? DID?) is ()
  essentially () the (What?) manipulation () of (What?) algorithms
  () , (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and () this
  (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () one () of () the () key (What?)
  assumptions () of () some (What?) varieties () of () artificial
  (What?) intelligence (END OF LOOP.) . (What?) Homunculus (What?)
  arguments (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () always () fallacious ()
  unless () some (What?) way () can (0) be (What was done to
  ____?) found (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What did/will ____ DO?)
  'ground () ' () the (What?) regress (END OF LOOP.) . () In
  (What?) psychology (If I add this part, will you believe me
  now?) and (What?) philosophy () of (What?) mind () , (What?)
  'homunculus (What?) arguments () ' () ( (If I add this part,
  will you believe me now?) or () the (What?) 'homunculus (What?)
  fallacies () ' () ) (DOING? DONE? DID?) are () extremely ()
  useful () for (What is ____ doing?) detecting (0) where (What?)
  theories () of (What?) mind (What did/will ___ DO?) fail (If I
  add this part, will you believe me now?) or (DOING? DONE? DID?)
  are () incomplete (END OF LOOP.) . () The (What?) homunculus
  (What?) fallacy (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () closely (What was done
  to ____?) related (WHAT DIRECTION?) to (What?) Ryle () 's
  (What?) regress (END OF LOOP.) . (What?) Counterarguments () The
  () above (What was done to ____?) cited (What?) regress (What?)
  argument (What does ___ do?) does () not () necessarily (What
  did/will ____ DO?) invalidate () all (What?) forms () of () the
  (What?) homunculus (What?) argument (END OF LOOP.) . () The
  (What?) regress (What does ___ do?) relies () on () the (What?)
  idea () that () the (What?) homunculus (What?) 'inside () ' ()
  the (What?) brain () must (What?) itself (ATTACHED?) have () a
  (What?) homunculus () inside (What?) it (If I add this part,
  will you believe me now?) but (What?) it (DOING? DONE? DID?) is
  () not () clear () that () this (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () a ()
  necessary (What?) condition (END OF LOOP.) . () A (What?)
  dualist () might (What did/will ____ DO?) argue () that () the
  (What?) homunculus () inside () the (What?) brain (DOING? DONE?
  DID?) is () an (What?) imaterial () one () ( () such () as ()
  the () cartesian (What?) soul () ) () , (If I add this part,
  will you believe me now?) or () a (What?) mystic () might (What
  did/will ____ DO?) argue () that () the (What?) homunculus
  (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () a (What?) recharacterization () of ()
  the () infinite (What?) consciousness () of (What?) God () ( (If
  I add this part, will you believe me now?) or () TRUE (What?)
  self () ) () , (If I add this part, will you believe me now?)
  and () thereby (What does ___ do?) does () not (What did/will
  ____ DO?) require () a (What?) homunculus () ( (If I add this
  part, will you believe me now?) or (What?) spirit () ) (WHAT
  DIRECTION?) to (ATTACHED?) have () sensory (What?) experience
  (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or () for () an
  (What?) end (WHAT DIRECTION?) to () the (What?) regress () at ()
  this (What?) point () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me
  now?) or () some () later () one () ) () in () another (What?)
  manner (END OF LOOP.) . () A (What?) non-dualist () may (What
  did/will ____ DO?) argue () that () a () human (What?) life
  (What?) form () ( (If I add this part, will you believe me now?)
  or () any (What?) organism () ) (DOING? DONE? DID?) is ()
  coterminous (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) and
  () indivisible () from (Whose is it?) its (What?) environment ()
  , () with () this () unified (What?) field () of (What?)
  awareness () ( () i.e. () , () universal (What?) consciousness
  () ) (What is ____ doing?) mistaking (What?) itself () for () a
  (What?) homunculus (END OF LOOP.) . () Thus () , () the (What?)
  regress (What?) argument (DOING? DONE? DID?) is () only () valid
  () if () there () can (0) be () no () other (What?) explanation
  () of () the (What?) homunculus () 's (What?) cognition (What
  did ___ do?) supplied () , (If I add this part, will you believe
  me now?) and () the (What?) arguments () of () a (What?) First
  (What?) Cause (If I add this part, will you believe me now?) or
  () a () transcendental (What?) consciousness () ( () i.e. () ,
  (What?) awareness (What is ____ doing?) underlying (If I add
  this part, will you believe me now?) and () beyond (What?) form
  () ) (DOING? DONE? DID?) are (What was done to ____?) rejected
  (END OF LOOP.) .

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.