I wouldn't go so far as advocating full anarchy. I believe
  systems _do_ serve their functions for people yet I believe all
  systems that gather and process humans are flawed. I don't
  believe full anarchy is a solution, tempting as it is. I want
  cops. Judges. I want to be able to buy a product made 5000 miles
  away cheaply because of systems in place that allow for things
  to get to me. Where am I gonna get my laptop from where I am?
  Systems like the Internet require cooperation on a very large
  scale. BUT within these flawed systems, some basic civility and
  an allowance for anarchy is necessary imo for a functional
  society. Push and pull. Lots of "leave me alone and I'll leave
  you alone". Cooperation on scales greater than basic civility
  when a group of people want to accomplish a goal. But I put
  civility as primary with force (either from the in to the out or
  the out to the in) as something that should rarely be necessary.
  I took a test once that put me as a "social anarchist". I'd say
  that's more or less true.

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.