Not at all. It's built into the hiring system, the probational
period. They don't care about how you can do in the BEGINNING of
the job. They know you're not just gonna "jump in and be
perfect". Why? Because YOU DON'T KNOW _how_ they're going to
need you to use that knowledge, how much of it you need to know.
"Do I know Java?" "Yes". I know the name of it. I know what it
does. I know what's unique about it. I know what I like and
don't like about it. Can I write something in scratch with Java?
No. But I don't know what they need. It's not lying to say
"yes". It may _feel like_ lying, but it's not. Now, if they
asked, "Do you know the behaviors of Transnuclear mice with
predefined T cell receptors?" I have to say "No". But do I know
Java? Yes. Do I know enough for the job? No way to know even if
I could write Java in my sleep. So, liar? No. Knowledge is
capabilities, not answering multiple choice questions... unless
the job has a quiz. tongue emoticon == Awesome :)* Yeah, I think
it's the only way to get into a good job with growth potential
for yourself. == Yes, I found giving some autobiographical
stories of my background in similar areas to be extremely
useful. I'm good at those, so I did well in that way. I like the
glass of water idea. I'll be sure to add that to my mental list
of interview tips when someone asks me "what to do". I may not
give perfect advice, but I try to boost confidence in those who
lack it but are capable. ==