I like both hard and soft science fiction, although I prefer the
well-researched science fiction (hard) generally as I don't have
to leave my scientific knowledge behind - less suspension of
disbelief required. Referring to the questionable areas of the
Sciences. Every Science has its fictional elements to it: part
of what drives their particular field forward quite often. A
fantastic science with lots of verifiable evidence and sold
proofs and repeatability can have a nugget of fiction at the
core that remains science fiction or unprovable or hope. Doesn't
make that Science bad, just having fictional elements. == Most
of it is good. Just speaking of the difficulty at times of
figuring out where that line is. I'm not speaking of stuff like
paranormal and stuff like that... I'm thinking of areas of each
of the Sciences (not really all 150+ but the... I dunno 7 or 8
major branches) - and where they stray into areas of Science
Fiction... sometimes significantly so. ==
