In short, we need post-modern thought. We need absurdism. We

In short, we need post-modern thought. We need absurdism. We
need lying. We need to alternatives to reductionism like
emergence, etc because: empirical, objective knowledge is very
limited in scope. It is pragmatic and great for what it does,
but it has to be kept in perspective. == empricism, objectivism,
reductionism, had their heads chopped off in the late 20s/early
30s by physics itself. Hanging onto it is a pretender's game. We
know too much now and can't go back to the 19th century science.
==