I'm tempted by Ignosticism for myself - yet, I just go with
  metaphorical connections. (analogies - whatever); solves the
  definition problem for me. Lets me be accurate without needing
  to be precise. The strive for the "perfect definition"
  (precision) is what leads us around in circles. But by working
  with accuracy (being loosely, round-about, gist), I think common
  connections are more possible. But admittedly, Ignosticism is
  temping for me. Took me long enough to begrudgingly accept
  'agnostic' even though that's not entirely correct either smile
  emoticon

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.