One of the main theories is that there are two main parts of the
  visual system. One seems to assemble the outline very quickly.
  The outline of objects is a bit of an illusion but it's
  necessary for humans. The outlining is very quick and there's a
  very fast pattern matching that takes place. Well, it's not
  pattern MATCHING it's more like, "What is this NOT." That's why
  sometimes it narrows down to a few contradictory choices at
  once: Several possibilities have nearly equal weights. A good
  example of this is a parking lot experience. You can't find your
  car. Why? You can narrow down that it's in the parking lot in
  one of the slots. But the possibilities of WHERE it's parked
  bring up MANY overlapping possibilities at once. In short, you
  don't MATCH UP so much, as inhibit until the least unlikely
  choice remains.. and sometimes there are several less unlikely
  choices. This sounds like the same as matching up, but it's
  quite different. = [I can backup with data if I have to 'cause I
  was REALLY into this stuff about 2 years ago - still am - but
  I'd rather explain it if it doesn't make sense. Sharpens my
  knowledge when I try to explain.   = To put it shorter, our
  brains go from "one to everything to one" rather than "one to
  one" ==

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.