For my sanity, long ago, I've had to adopt an absurdist point of
  view towards everything. I feel the injustice and I still don't
  like being wrong - yet when I'm in a debate, I remind myself
  that while words have power, they don't have to have power over
  my emotional state. I started practicing in the 3rd grade and I
  got very good at being able to deflect words, as I have a strong
  mental thesaurus and can make bad things good in my mind very
  quickly and the other person "just having a bad day". I do it
  for my own protection against emotional manipulation. But not
  just against me. I can never turn my "empathy" circuits off. In
  a room, I feel what people feel. Positive, negative, every
  emotion that's coming out of them, it hits me all at once.
  Thankfully, on the Internet I have control and can do things
  that are difficult in real life: take several points of view,
  diffuse emotional situations... because it's the realm of
  writing, a place where I do well. I'm still sitting here in my
  comfortable chair and can see the pixels on the screen when I
  need to. But even here, I feel connected to everybody I talk to.
  Their emotional states start to become my own. So it's a
  constant struggle between the two: maintaining an absurdist
  point of view towards everything keeps me from feeling hurt as
  much as I normally would. Yet it doesn't stop the empathy
  circuits from receiving everything.