I have a hyperphysical view of things... probably more than
  most. But I also don't believe in the dichotomy between material
  and immaterial. But I also have a weird view of Time that allows
  for things not arrow-of-time-like. AND... I also believe our
  senses and deductive capabilities are, while fantastic, are and
  will always be limited because neither we nor anything we create
  (which would include AI) can exceed whatever the maximal
  capabilities of human beings _could_ potentially be. [I can
  explain further but I'll be concise] So... how can it? It does.
  Is it immaterial? I suppose it could be construed well enough as
  immaterial but I also see fictions and beliefs and certainties
  and lies as very physical things as well. But our understandings
  of things are based upon analogies and yes, I see analogies as
  physical as well. Yet, not all things might be fully
  discernible. So... yeah. Call it word-salad. Hard to explain a
  philosophy in a few sentences smile emoticon == Indeed. It has
  to be experienced and even then, not all things are given to
  analogies and therefore not all things are explainable without
  experience to analogize to. ==

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.