Well, I never finished college + the IRS begs to differ but then
  again, I know how to move what little $ I have around tongue
  emoticon but yes, I'm far from a peasant immigrant, although he
  gave a rather extreme example. From a worldwide
  economic/educational standpoint, I am an educated wealthy
  individual. I accept that and I'm rather glad for it. I'm
  grateful for privilege that's thanks purely to happenstance of
  birth. Anyway, I agree that religion dominance needs to be
  excised from politics. I don't mind MILD inclusions of religion
  that exists within some governments - things like "under God" in
  the USA I don't care if they stay or go, and swearing on the
  Bible stuff is silly tradition that can stay or go, and the
  inclusion of religious tradition in English education for
  example is hardly an issue but I'm sure ppl can argue for its
  removal if its bothersome to their personal whatevers. English
  Common Law itself is Christian. No way of getting around it.
  It's as Christian as Sharia is Islamic. But it's the extremes
  that are at issue. In many ways, Sharia and Common Law are
  _mostly_ comparable legal systems. [we just focus on extremes
  because, well, some of it is extreme] But that's where diplomacy
  comes into play. Diplomacy *is* secular _without_ requiring
  removal of religions. Diplomacy is not atheist. It is agnostic.
  It's ignostic. It's "don't know, don't care". Human rights *do*
  have a historically Christian background, as secular humanism is
  the product of a Christian culture ultimately, as humanism
  itself is AND secularism and rationalism. However, despite their
  roots, both secularism (separation of government and religious
  affairs) and humanism (scholarship) have grown to a point that
  they are accepted in most of the world as a "baseline" of "This
  Is Good" in nearly all cultures, whatever their dominating
  religion may be. It is through diplomacy, discussion, humanism
  and secularism that peace can be achieved, regardless of the
  religious or irrelgiousness of the peoples involved. That's it's
  power and strength: Not as a replacement-for, but a
  supplement-to It remains powerful regardless of the religions or
  lack of.