I'm focusing on "What's good". Sometimes I focus on what's not
  good - when politics and fundamentalist thinking gets mixed into
  it, just as I sometimes focus on what's not good with the
  single-blind peer review process for peer reviewed papers. [WHY
  they don't switch to double-blind has some of the lamest
  excuses] But, I think it's possible to both simultaneously.
  Focus on what's good and use it while ALSO combating what's
  broken.

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.