Well, the article has a strong bias and strong biased articles I
  take with a bit of salt, especially when there's talk of
  conspiracy. BUT that being said: I believe it's more or less
  correct. It's doesn't fit the news profile people want to hear.
  We need clear cut good guys and bad guys and the lines are drawn
  and the people chosen. If someone doesn't fit neatly into that
  profile of what we expect to see in the news, it's put in small
  print in a far off page. But if it fits the "larger story" being
  told, it gets front page.

You are viewing proxied material from sdf.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.